Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So is Legette getting traded?


ProcessBlue2
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would say we wouldn't get anything for him in a trade, but we found 1 team stupid enough to trade us a 4th for Mingo.

I don't think they trade him though, barring an offer like that, but they won't pick up his option and just let him walk after year 4. Will he not be nearly 30 at that point anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd try to trade XL for something (anything) and it's time for coach favorite Moore to be sent packing. 

I agree with Moore but honestly if he doesn’t suit up but 10 games and contributes it’ll be better than trading him for a 4-7 rounder. Cooker pops a hammy we'll need him to step right in. He may be down the depth cart but it’s prob better to have him than a random 6th round practice squad LB. It’s such a long and brutal season quality depth is needed we just hate that it’s our 1st rounder that’s depth to a undrafted guy but that’s how it played out.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Was listening to a podcast a couple days ago and they were talking about how Canales said he wanted to use Legette after he was drafted and he hasn’t followed through with any of it. Not saying they were right, but it was an interesting take I hadn't heard before. 

I never thought they used him right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

I agree with Moore but honestly if he doesn’t suit up but 10 games and contributes it’ll be better than trading him for a 4-7 rounder. Cooker pops a hammy we'll need him to step right in. He may be down the depth cart but it’s prob better to have him than a random 6th round practice squad LB. It’s such a long and brutal season quality depth is needed we just hate that it’s our 1st rounder that’s depth to a undrafted guy but that’s how it played out.

I honestly think Tremayne looks more promising than XL.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

T Mac 

coker 

Brazell 

are locks

I put Tremayne as a near lock they really like him a lot and he adds a lot 

So that leaves two spots for Moore, Horn, metchie and XL

If had to guess right now Metchie gets cut, they try to stash away Horn on the PS and XL and Moore are on the team 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trade him.  Trying to find him reps on game days will be pointless.  Why have a former first rounder sit on the bench?  I would even take a future day 3 pick or player-for-player swap.  

We just drafted his clone. I thought if we went WR, it would be for a pure slot guy.  The fact that we went out and drafted a player in what we thought we had in XL is very telling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

He's not going anywhere.  

In large part because there's probably no one offering anything of value. If the only thing you can get in return is a conditional late rounder or something of that nature then yeah, we're probably better off just bringing him in for another camp and see if he put in the work to improve this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...