Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tell what the thread is about in the title


panthers55

Recommended Posts

One of my pet peeves are posters who start threads with titles like:

Hey guys.........

I want to know....

I been wondering.........

You open up the thread to find out that the thread is about Chudzinski or a player or the salary cap.

Why not title the thread something like: Thoughts about Chudzinski's contract or I want to know about how the salary cap works.

And even those aren't great because you could have asked the question in a thread already started on the topic instead of asking a question in a new thread.

How about adding to the knowledge base instead of asking questions that have been discussed previously.

I am going to make it my policy to ignore threads that don't clearly state what they are about. If we all did that, they would quickly disappear.

Just my pet peeve that I feel better about after putting it out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my pet peeves are posters who start threads with titles like:

Hey guys.........

I want to know....

I been wondering.........

You open up the thread to find out that the thread is about Chudzinski or a player or the salary cap.

Why not title the thread something like: Thoughts about Chudzinski's contract or I want to know about how the salary cap works.

And even those aren't great because you could have asked the question in a thread already started on the topic instead of asking a question in a new thread.

How about adding to the knowledge base instead of asking questions that have been discussed previously.

I am going to make it my policy to ignore threads that don't clearly state what they are about. If we all did that, they would quickly disappear.

Just my pet peeve that I feel better about after putting it out there.

1261611415087.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind so mouch when people do that in thread titles because I usually don't look at them anyway. What I do hate though is when the same people bitch at me for making a thread about something that has already been created in another thread but their other thread was titled something stupid so I have no idea it's already been discussed.

For example:

Huddler X sees that the Panthers traded for Greg Olsen and makes a thread titled "OMGZ!!!1!! Did you guys hear?!??" This person also provides a link as the first sentence, so even if I do a mouse-over of their thread title for a preview it gives absolutely no indication as to what the thread is about.

Montsta sees that the Panthers traded for Greg Olsen and makes a thread titled "The Panthers just traded a 3rd round pick for Greg Olsen"

Huddler X then comes into my thread and berates me because a thread already exists on that topic.

That is the dickhead move I don't like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Honestly, I'll probably just tap out if it happens. Tune in again some time down the road if we ever jerk our head out of our ass as a franchise. 
    • Why do you say that. What leads you to think that we, as supporters, think his ceiling is 10-12. That's a ridiculous assumption on your part. The Seahawks won the SB with Darnold passing for 25 TD's, 14 Ints with a 99.1 rating for the season.  The Panthers with Young were at 23 TD's, 11 Ints and a 78.8 rating for the season. Not that far off. The problem with all the Young discourse around here is the assumption that the QB is the sole determining factor for a teams success. That just isn't true and it's certainly not how Morgan and Tilis are building the Panthers. 
    • Do we pay based on how many wins or how many games Bryce led us to wins? We've spent quite a bit on defense this year and hopefully they're much improved. If the Panthers do get to 10 wins, but Bryce has another year like last year where he showed up big in a couple, was present in a few, and forgettable in most, do we still pay him 50m per year?  I keep bringing it up because I think it's relevant, but Bryce was outplayed by a 6m per year backup last year. I don't see how it's possible to pay a top tier QB contract to someone who's putting up backup QB production. 
×
×
  • Create New...