Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tell what the thread is about in the title


panthers55

Recommended Posts

One of my pet peeves are posters who start threads with titles like:

Hey guys.........

I want to know....

I been wondering.........

You open up the thread to find out that the thread is about Chudzinski or a player or the salary cap.

Why not title the thread something like: Thoughts about Chudzinski's contract or I want to know about how the salary cap works.

And even those aren't great because you could have asked the question in a thread already started on the topic instead of asking a question in a new thread.

How about adding to the knowledge base instead of asking questions that have been discussed previously.

I am going to make it my policy to ignore threads that don't clearly state what they are about. If we all did that, they would quickly disappear.

Just my pet peeve that I feel better about after putting it out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my pet peeves are posters who start threads with titles like:

Hey guys.........

I want to know....

I been wondering.........

You open up the thread to find out that the thread is about Chudzinski or a player or the salary cap.

Why not title the thread something like: Thoughts about Chudzinski's contract or I want to know about how the salary cap works.

And even those aren't great because you could have asked the question in a thread already started on the topic instead of asking a question in a new thread.

How about adding to the knowledge base instead of asking questions that have been discussed previously.

I am going to make it my policy to ignore threads that don't clearly state what they are about. If we all did that, they would quickly disappear.

Just my pet peeve that I feel better about after putting it out there.

1261611415087.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't mind so mouch when people do that in thread titles because I usually don't look at them anyway. What I do hate though is when the same people bitch at me for making a thread about something that has already been created in another thread but their other thread was titled something stupid so I have no idea it's already been discussed.

For example:

Huddler X sees that the Panthers traded for Greg Olsen and makes a thread titled "OMGZ!!!1!! Did you guys hear?!??" This person also provides a link as the first sentence, so even if I do a mouse-over of their thread title for a preview it gives absolutely no indication as to what the thread is about.

Montsta sees that the Panthers traded for Greg Olsen and makes a thread titled "The Panthers just traded a 3rd round pick for Greg Olsen"

Huddler X then comes into my thread and berates me because a thread already exists on that topic.

That is the dickhead move I don't like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...