Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sooooo.... DeAngelo Williams......

AKPantherFan

By AKPantherFan,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

We need to spend less money on the run game....bottom line.

Name the RB in Green Bay right now?

I was hard on Williams last year as a runner (that was separate than the contract debacle rants).....he is simply running better this year and he isn't getting much help. He is earning those.....OL still leaving a lot to be desired

Link to comment
Share on other sites
brandon_87 Newbie

brandon_87

Posted
Posted

I don't think the majority of this fan base understands DWill  is a good RB plain and simple.  It was the read option and read option alone that made him look bad recently, and ...what a coincidence, we do away with the bullshit, and he comes out looking good again...  Is he over paid?  yes...  should he be traded?  not be any means.  carry on

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted

We need to spend less money on the run game....bottom line.

Name the RB in Green Bay right now?

I was hard on Williams last year as a runner (that was separate than the contract debacle rants).....he is simply running better this year and he isn't getting much help. He is earning those.....OL still leaving a lot to be desired

 

soooo you were wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Floppin Grand Master

Floppin

Posted
Posted

Honestly, at this point there are much larger wastes of money on our roster. Stewart has, by far, been a bigger waste of his large contract to this point. Godfrey and Beason are similar wastes of money currently. 

 

I'm not justifying his paycheck, because no team should ever pay a running back that sort of check, especially one that they consider a "split duty" back (though he's a featured back presently), but there's worse waste on the payroll at present. Remember more of Stewarts contract was guaranteed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon Snow
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...