Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just gettin' opinions..how may of the sacks were the OL's fault


TonyN

Recommended Posts

Need to go back and rewatch it but not all of them.

Play calling, poor blocking, and a qb who takes to long to make a read and deliver the ball were all equally responsible.

 

Pretty much this...I think we should have a 4 second play limit in practice where Passing play have to be over in 4 seconds or a horn goes off and the players are penalized in some way. That way the receivers have to get open in that time and Cam has to get the ball off in that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Enough blame to go around on all of them.

Hard to tell how many are coverage sacks and how many are Cam just holding the ball too long.

But if you want a QB that just throws it away every time his first couple of reads are not open we will be even worse on offense.

The play calling and offensive scheming can help also.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The frustrating thing is that the offense ran well in the 1st half.  The fact that we only had 6 points on the board at halftime was due to failed execution - namely dropped passes.  We were getting the ball out fast, we were mixing it up well mixing in the run game, and overall executing a good gameplan.  It's just that we got plain whipped in terms of halftime adjustments.  The Chiefs came out with a gameplan to blitz the hell out of us while spying Cam with a LB and we never countered their adjustments.  It would've been nice to see a couple of screen passes to make them think twice about their constant pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much this...I think we should have a 4 second play limit in practice where Passing play have to be over in 4 seconds or a horn goes off and the players are penalized in some way. That way the receivers have to get open in that time and Cam has to get the ball off in that time.

 

That's a system implementation. That's routes being designed. Ginn is the ONLY receiver that gets off the line like THAT. Speed kills which is why I was so disappointed we released Gettis, but he couldn't stay healthy 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To say Cam was responsible for most of the sacks is another move by "fans" who can't wait to bash him for something. Some people actually thought Cam was responsible for the safety, when CLEARLY he had his back to the pressure and it was EXACTLY 1.8 seconds after he took the snap after center-- don't worry, I timed it. Byron Bell was again responsible for MOST of the pressure that Cam had this game, Gross and Amini played very well, until Amini got hurt of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...