Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FYI: Would be "shocking" if Giants re-sign Nicks...


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

Something to keep an eye on...

@DanGrazianoESPN: Oh, there are going to be so many. Justin Tuck's situation is a big one. It's possible he's earned a new deal with his big second half, but it's also possible they move on from a franchise pillar, which would be a huge story. Hakeem Nicks is a bit less so, since at this point I think it'd be shocking if he were back, and even if he is it'd be on a team-friendly deal. So I'm going to say that Manning extension to which I referred above. Fans may not love it when the Giants announce a huge-money, long-term commitment to Manning off his worst season, but a Manning extension is the surest way to create the 2014 cap room they need. And given what's out there, short-term and long-term, for potential replacements, it's the only move for them to make.

http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/giants/post/_/id/33027/twitter-mailbag-gilbride-thoughts

Giants have to give a new contract to Eli. They also have to sign Tuck. Nicks is coming off a down year. There's a real good chance he could come here with a not so big contract. Hope it works out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not in love with Nicks. Like I have aid in other threads: His knees are highly suspect. He just no longer gets the separation that he once did, and basically uses his big frame to out-muscle smaller CBs for the ball, the few times that he can get half-way open. His production hasn't equaled to his hype for the last few years, and I don't see risking a ton of money to find out if he can get back to his old self...which really never materialized. He's a big WR who seems to have some upside, but may just complete his busting ways.

 

$5 mil a year. I would be loath to give him that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

while Nicks' production is down this year in TDs he would still be our #1 receiver in yards and in ypc and is headed for one of his best seasons in yards and ypc.  his lack of TDs is, imo, an anomaly and not indicative of the quality of receiver he is.

 

he's still a very good receiver.  he hasn't looked that great this year, but no Giant has (other than Victor Cruz imo).  I think he still creates separation against most defenders and can really go after the ball.

 

but his durability is a huge concern.  can he finish a season?  he's never had a 16 game season in his career.  

 

all depends what he wants to be paid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Honestly, the guy does a TON of good research. His videos are always high quality and his insight is always stellar.  This video however changed my mind...dramatically about the draft.  Anyone who's seen my opinions knows Im a all in BPA guy, HOWEVER, this kind of changed my mind...Im now a BPA...at position of value dictated by the board.  A lot of words to say, weighted average is important. We all all know that having a good qb on a rookie contract is important, but what about a good edge...or reciever...or tackle?  THOSE things make a different and this opened my eyes to that.  With that said, not that I think we SHOULD go receiver in the first, HOWEVER, IT DOES MAKE SENSE.  If you have good young recievers coming in on rookie contracts, then you have more to build the rest of the roster at a lower cost.  If we were a team loaded at Receiver then things would be different, however, we only truly have 2 reliable WRs, so would another Receiver be a bad pick...I actually dont think so now based on value going forward.  Its just something to consider for everyone.    
    • Yeah, it's fool's gold. Darnold always had the tools. He just needed a tram with an elite D, a top 5 WR, and a Super Bowl MVP RB to carry him so he wouldn't be asked to press where he becomes a turnover machine. Darnold settled in once he was in a situation where he could just be a very talented game manager. People try to tell themselves Bryce can do that without realizing that Darnold still forces the D to respect the throws he can make that the coaches would rather he not attempt where as Bryce simply doesn't have the physical ability to force that respect opening up other opportunities. Like Parcells said leading up to the draft that based on his physical tool set "he better walk on water". What he was politely trying to say is that Bryce simply doesn't have an NFL physical tool set.
    • Got home in time to see Halls goal in the 3rd. Saw replays of Staal and LeCuck dropping gloves on the faceoff loved that! Playoff Freddie entered the building  woo! Hope to see the full replay on Fandual.
×
×
  • Create New...