Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Salary Cap Info


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

I've seen quite a few questions lately about certain salary cap scenarios concerning some of our players if they were cut so I thought I would consolidate some of the info here.  Also I will try to give everyone an idea of what we are looking at next year as a team.

 

I don't claim to be an expert on this stuff so if something is wrong feel free to let me know.

 

All of this info is from http://overthecap.com/salary-cap/carolina-panthers.

 

As of right now we have roughly 7m in cap space.

 

For 2015 we have 129m committed, this is only for 38 players though.

To get a true idea of where we stand we have to add 15 more players, practice squad, IR, and some for next years rookies.

 

  129m  38 players under contract

   7.5m  15 players at 500k

   2.0m  IR  (going off of what we have right now, this number could be more or less)

   1.0m  Practice squad

   2.0m  Rookies  (this number could changed based on where we pick in the draft)

 141.5m

 

Salary cap is 133m this year, most expect it to go up next year.  If it goes up to 140m we are a little bit over.  Good news is whatever we are under this year will roll over.  Like I said earlier we have roughly 7m right now.  Based on injuries and any acquisitions this number could change.  

 

If we assume we roll over 6m that would put us around 4.5m in available space next year.

 

Here are some notable free agents the next few years.

 

2015 - Hardy, Cole, Edwards, Cason 

2016 - Cam, Olsen, TD, Alexander, Tolbert, Luke (we can pick up a 5th year option on him)

2017 - CJ, Kalil, Short, Star (we can pick up a 5th year option on him)

 

Several people have asked about the implications of cutting various players next year.  All of these assume June 1st cuts. Also I rounded the numbers to make the math a little easier.

 

I know the format isn't the best so I'll use Stewart to explain the chart.  

 

If we keep Stewart the next 2 years his cap hit will be 8.3m in 2015 and 9.6m in 2016.  

If we cut Stewart next year as a June 1st cut his cap hit will be 6.3m in 2015 and 7.3m in 2016.  This would be carried as dead money on the books.

This would free up 2m in 2015 and 2.3m in 2016

 

                    Cap hit if kept                               Cap hit if cut                              Savings

                     2015      2016                             2015       2016                        2015       2016

CJ                20.0m    15.0m                          10.0m       4.0m                       10m         11m

 

Kalil              11.8m     10.3m                          6.2m        5.9m                         5.6m      4.4m

 

TD                  9.9m       3.0m                          2.4m        3.0m                         7.5m         0m

 

Williams          6.3m       2.2m                          4.4m        2.2m                        1.9m         0m

 

Stewart           8.3m       9.6m                          6.3m        7.3m                            2m      2.3m

 

Olsen              7.8m       1.2m                          2.3m        1.2m                         5.5m         0m

 

Godfrey           7.1m       6.4m                          2.0m        1.0m                         5.1m      5.4m

 

Tolbert            3.4m                                             1m                                         2.4m

 

Decoud           2.2m                                           250k                                        2.0m

 

 

The numbers that are bolded are actually voidable years.  That cap hit is without them playing.  That would be TD, Olsen, and Williams in 2016.

 

Once you get past these guys there really isn't anyone to cut to create any substantial cap space.  Also remember whenever you cut a guy his spot on the roster is replaced by someone else so you have to account for that salary.

 

For example in our Stewart example we would create 2m in cap space by cutting him but he would at least be replaced by someone making around 500k.  So in reality we have only created 1.5m that we can use elsewhere.

 

Hopefully this will give everyone a better understanding of the decisions that our front office faces.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you need a laugh look at the Saints

 

They are definitely trying to win now.  They have a few contracts that are big salaries but fairly low dead money so they can free up a good amount of room by cutting a few players.  Also I would guess Brees will restructure at some point.  This will just move some dead money into the future but it will help them next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are definitely trying to win now. They have a few contracts that are big salaries but fairly low dead money so they can free up a good amount of room by cutting a few players. Also I would guess Brees will restructure at some point. This will just move some dead money into the future but it will help them next year.

I dislike this by bringing in facts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're not understanding what I'm saying. I'm saying that truly elite players will always have a market because they're elite difference makers and that at the "devalued positions" the NFL has discovered that those are spots where unless you have an elite talent there you have an opportunity to get similar results out of run of the mill talent for run of the mill money compared to good talent for good money. The drop off in overall unit performance isn't dramatic dropping down from "good" to "JAG" and it saves money to invest in the premium positions. It's about skill sets and what is hardest to find, simple supply and demand. There's just more serviceable LBs and RBs and safeties out there than their are CBs and pass rushers and QBs. And honestly, a big part of our historic lack of consistent success has been investing too many premium draft and cap resources into those devalued positions. Yeah, we've had a lot of great off the ball LBs and RBs on our way to be a franchise with an overall losing record. Pointing to our success at those positions is proving my point because I just point to our W-L record and overall lack of historical quality at premium positions like QB, WR, CB, etc. We've sucked in large part because we've valued the wrong position groups. In a vacuum it doesn't matter. But in actuality every high pick or big chunk of cap you spend on an off the ball LB or RB or IOL is a high pick or big chunk of cap you couldn't spend on a QB or CB or WR or OT.
    • Right before Kuechly retired, we had some of the worst D line play that year.  We were ranked 29th against the run in 2019.   I remember even Kuechly struggled to get off the blocks at times because the linemen were on second level so quickly due to our porous line made up of Kyle Love, Vernon Butler and a washed up Gerald McCoy.   
    • fingers crossed for BlueSky embeds to come with the board update at least all the schedule reveals will be on the youtube  
×
×
  • Create New...