Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was Gettleman the right GM choice? How long to stay with him?


raleigh-panther

Recommended Posts

I'm interested in what everyone thinks.

For me, I just am having trouble looking at that oline and secondary and believing he is.

I've never been what he was with the VP of Pro Personnel, I believe that was the title, but like almost everyone on here I could have told him the tackle situation was not going to work along with Harper and Decloud...there just had to be midrange talent available better than this.

Then the whole Smith situation and extending Rivera and his staff

Even some of his draft picks are head scratchers.

As a PSL holder my tickets are virtually worthless again.

The team is just spectacularly bad. It's embarrassing and I'm not sure it needed to be. How they won 3 games is beyond me and make no mistake even if they should manage to beat lesser teams so what...is that what we want....A team that can't even compete against better teams? Isnt that what we had the later years of the Fox era?

For me the deal breakers are the tackle situations and Harper/Decloud. I just don't believe in him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is drafting very well, thus far. Still early for results, but the young returns looking great. Remember he only had 5 picks(league low) in his first GM draft. He hit on 3, one derailed by injuries, and the other just a dud it happens. 2014, five out of six have shown their not complete waste. He's done great at UDFAs, about three per year. That's cheap labor and their success brings more Wanting to come here.

So far he's getting a push for free agency, 2013 was good as 2014 is bad. Again a little unfair judging here, cause I'm about 99.9996480457% sure if dave knew the hardy deal..... he would have took that 13 and got some OL help. Plus the other FAs wouldn't look as bad.

Handling the cap, this is my opinion- he's done fine, not super great. I believe just about any other GM would have done similar moves. People forget the herniays cap guy remains on staff and even if total different GM came in, a plan was already in place.

My big beef is the handling of smitty, no problem with the cut(you can t pay him 7 this yr and 10 next year at his age, given his actions), just the circus that happen.

I will know better at seasons end, plus the panthers are still in cap hell. Starting 2016, with no/dead money, no terrible contracts(I hope), it will allow him more resources to make the panthers a winning/playoff team year after year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

let's see what he does next year.

rivera....not really interested in seeing that.

i don't think gettleman had any idea it would be this bad. i want to see what he does to correct course.

In fairness it would not be this bad if Hardy was on the field. That was something totally unexpected.

This franchise needed to hit the reset button from the Fox/Hurney era and I'm glad Gettleman is doing that as painful as this season has been. He's produced some very good drafts and struck gold with the role playing free agents last season.

On the other hand, were the Hardy situation to come up under the Hurney regime, we would be stuck with Hardy under a long term deal, paid long term deals for guys like Mitchell and Captain to get exposed because of his absence and we would still be looking at the same type of season with a bleaker cap sheet.

I trust that Gettleman will do the right thing and shake up the coaching staff and offensive line this offseason in addition to making even more cuts that will unearth some desperately needed cap space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a devoted Carolina Panthers fan,I want to have faith that Gettleman has a long range plan in mind. I don't think Richardson would just let him be a lose cannon and have an outlandish plan that had no chace to Succeed. This supposed plan of his may take another year or two, as fans we have to sit back and see if this assumption is correct.,even though it's nerve racking to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For someone who has done so good in the draft?well tell me then, why we can't stop the run or put pressure on the QB and heaven forbids a sack,jeeeezus,

btw,two second rounders and one first rounder have already been invested on the dL alone thus far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say yes. I think he has a formula that is fairly clear. He seems to fill holes with 1 yr deals and build through the draft. I think drafting is his strong suit. Time will ultimately tell but look at the draft picks we've had these last 2 years and compare that to the years of Hurney.  I think the secondary pans out a little differently if Hardy is there and there is some hope with the young talent there (Norman and Bene - Not really any data from Boston).

 

The o-line has been his biggest blunder so far. But yet, any hope that we have on the line is directly because of his drafting/rookie signings. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For someone who has done so good in the draft?well tell me then, why we can't stop the run or put pressure on the QB and heaven forbids a sack,jeeeezus,

btw,two second rounders and one first rounder have already been invested on the dL alone thus far.

After QB, the smart people agree DL is the next in terms of need/want/value(rookie contracts). I didn't like the back-2-back DT picks is 2013, but it proved to be the correct move. I said before the 2014 draft, gimme at least 2 OTs. Ozzie new some said after the top Five OTs, there is a huge drop off same thing dave said. I'm not going to bitach about UDFAs, even if there was about five.

Given hardy and cj, well both could be gone at seasons end. So the early pick, could easy be a starting DE. You cannt judge these young DL draft as finished products. Sure star is struggling, but short looks great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...