Question Gurley or Gordon?

[Biggdaddi1022]

If when we pick Gurley is gone and Gordon is on the board, would you go Gordon? Or is it that most of you guys only want a RB in the first of its Gurley?

[LinvilleGorge]

I'm not high on Gordon as a 1st round pick to be honest.  He gets stuffed a lot.  His 7.6ypc is a little misleading.  His runs are a bit of boom or bust.  Almost 20% of his carries at Wisconsin resulted in 0 gain or a loss.  1 out of 5 carries.

[jdpanther5]

A healthy Gurley is the best back in the draft. Of course he isn't healthy, so Gordon.

[L-TownCat]

A healthy Gurley, even though its been devalued, Would/should be the top pick in the draft.

 

AP 2.0

 

 

Disclaimer:  Not a draft a RB guy, just sayin.

[L-TownCat]

A healthy Gurley is the best back in the draft. Of course he isn't healthy, so Gordon.

 

Says hes already running again.

[csx]

Neither IMO.

[jasonluckydog]

Would be cool with either one

[rmoneyg35]

I keep hearing people say Gordon is a track star in a football uniform. That scares me. He put up huge numbers at Wisconsin but so have other running backs and what have they done in the NFL?

Coleman is another RB I fear may not be a NFl caliber player.

[PantherFanOne]

I would take Gurley if he's there when we draft at #25 but i feel there would be better options than Gordon.

[t96]

Only back I would be fine with us taking in the first 2 rounds is Gurley. He has game-changing talent, like Peterson. Gordon will be solid but not worth it for us in my opinion. If Gurley's gone I hope we don't go RB until the 3rd or later if we do at all because that's where the value will be.

[Rags]

Gordon is a tad overated imo. I like him, but I'm not a fan of him in round 1.

[LinvilleGorge]

I keep hearing people say Gordon is a track star in a football uniform. That scares me. He put up huge numbers at Wisconsin but so have other running backs and what have they done in the NFL?

Coleman is another RB I fear may not be a NFl caliber player.

 

I actually like Coleman > Gordon.

[janderson20vt]

I wouldn't accept a RB in the first not named Gurley.

[bababoey]

Gurley is the only back worth a 1st round pick.  Gordon is good but he is with about 4 or 5 other backs sitting in the second round.  Coleman or Johnson or Langford at the end of the 3rd would not be that much worse than Gordon.