Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which two round scenario appeals more to you?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

B, I like Peat, limitations in pass pro worry me some, but I have that worry with pretty much every tackle this year and Smith is just a perfect deep threat which we need so badly. Not only is he fast but he tracks the ball amazingly when it's in the air and will then go up and get it.

I don't like Strong, especially in the 1st so that ones out although I do like Fisher quite a bit.

Ogbeuhi is pretty much going to be red shirting as he would miss probably all of camp and Shaq's position on our team plays 30% of the snaps so you're basically getting almost no production next year for our top 2 picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A.  Strong and Fisher are both great prospects.  Peat would be great, but Devin Smith potentially has a limited role (I've watched lots of breakdown videos of him, not highlights, and he mostly just seems good for the deep ball...I want more than a 1 trick pony out of our 2nd round pick).  I like Shaq well enough, but not as our first pick.  Would be fine trading up for him in the 2nd (using other picks from this year, not next year's picks), and I'd be good with Ogbuehi in the 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A.

I really want another 6' receiver opposite KB. (But a faster one) Also, like many, I like the fact Fisher has experience protecting a mobile QB. I wouldn't be totally opposed to option B, but option C would bother me. I don't believe Shaq and Cedric would contribute much. I would be happier with either in the second round though. But we need to get a day one starter with our first round pick if possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...