Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brady suspended 4 games, pats lose 1st rounder in 2016 and 4th in 2017


Recommended Posts

4 fuging games? You gotta be kidding me. Should've been more than the 10 Hardy got. He'll fuging appeal and get it down to 2 (or in other words, nothing). And Belichick gets off free? I thought ignorance was no excuse Goodell you fuging loser. Both should've been suspended the entire year in addition to losing their 1st next year. What a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 fuging games? You gotta be kidding me. Should've been more than the 10 Hardy got. He'll fuging appeal and get it down to 2 (or in other words, nothing). And Belichick gets off free? I thought ignorance was no excuse Goodell you fuging loser. Both should've been suspended the entire year in addition to losing their 1st next year. What a joke.

 

 

That is a LUDICROUSLY excessive punishment.

 

so which is it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The teams this 2nd year player (can’t really blame the years before he was drafted on him) was playing were going 100% as most do most weeks in the NFL. The whole argument is about his play during that period and how well was he actually playing. I’m with you on the winning though. Just start winning and fans will get excited. Start getting in the playoffs and winning and we won’t care how his PFF or box score stats look. 200 yards a game to 400 yards a game, start scoring and winning playoffs games and 99% of fans will buy in. 
    • Yeah, we are gonna be raw.  Wonnum, for the past 3 years, has been averaging 8 sacks a season (4 in one season when he missed half a season).  I am OK, but yes, they will be thrown to the fire.
    • I like this because it means one or both of the rookies will be thrust into a bigger role right away and we can see what they might be. I don't like this because it just makes our team that much younger and inexperienced.  You need vets to help the young guys learn, I just hope we aren't going too far in the opposite direction.  All our FA signings were guys just coming off their rookie deals too, I get why we're doing it, but having the savvy vets help in other ways too.
×
×
  • Create New...