Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Texans Fans Are Saying

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
Jeremy Igo Newbie

Jeremy Igo

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Well, week two is upon us. 

This week the 0-1 Texans come to Bank of America stadium to face the 1-0 Panthers. 

The Panthers fought through adversity and a tough defense in Jacksonville to pull off a 20-9 victory. The Texans were dominated at home by the Kansas City Chiefs. Don't let the final score fool you, the score was 27-9 into the 4th quarter. Slop time points make the result seem closer than it was. 

First of all, The Houston Texans organization week 1 OFFICIAL GAMEDAY THREAD  on their own website had 920 comments and 28,000 views. The Huddle week 1 OFFICIAL GAMEDAY THREAD  had 2,059 comments and 53,750 views. Apparently the Huddle doubles them up. 

Well what are they saying over there? 

Observe...

I agree. The Texans will have to play much better across the board to win this one.
The Panthers should be a victory on the road though. 
The Texans should destroy them. 
They don't even come close to matching up with us on any level.

Wait... is this serious? 

giphy.gif

 

If Luke K is out for the Panthers defense, their defense is full of holes. 
The Panthers have no other real weapons. They are average at best without Luke.
Looks like he most likely won't be playing because of concussion protocols. 
Cam can't win it on his own, and the Texans are allot more to handle on both sides of the ball then the Jaguars.

Someone should inform Charles Johnson, Thomas Davis, Shaq Thomson, Josh Norman, Bene Benwikere, KK Short, Mario Addison... yada yada 

But most of the time currently within the Texans fan base is discussing a quarterback controversy. They are trying to decide which quarterback, Brian Hoyer or Ryan Mallett, is less awful. 

 

They both are equally as bad. 

So Sorry. 

i-m-so-sorry-o.gif

 


View full article

  • Pie 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carolina Cajun Mentor

Carolina Cajun

Posted
Posted

Well, week two is upon us. 

This week the 0-1 Texans come to Bank of America stadium to face the 1-0 Panthers. 

The Panthers fought through adversity and a tough defense in Jacksonville to pull off a 20-9 victory. The Texans were dominated at home by the Kansas City Chiefs. Don't let the final score fool you, the score was 27-9 into the 4th quarter. Slop time points make the result seem closer than it was. 

First of all, The Houston Texans organization week 1 OFFICIAL GAMEDAY THREAD  on their own website had 920 comments and 28,000 views. The Huddle week 1 OFFICIAL GAMEDAY THREAD  had 2,059 comments and 53,750 views. Apparently the Huddle doubles them up. 

Well what are they saying over there? 

Observe...

Wait... is this serious? 

giphy.gif

 

Someone should inform Charles Johnson, Thomas Davis, Shaq Thomson, Josh Norman, Bene Benwikere, KK Short, Mario Addison... yada yada 

But most of the time currently within the Texans fan base is discussing a quarterback controversy. They are trying to decide which quarterback, Brian Hoyer or Ryan Mallett, is less awful. 

 

Hidden Content

 

View full article

I agree with you on everything sans Shaq Thompson.  Shaq is way to unknown and for a long period last week was so non-existent that I didn't know he was even on the field.  That said, our defense will be fine against a Fosterless Texans team ran by either a Browns castoff or a cocaine addict.  Their defense could cause problems, but with how terribly they covered Kelce last weekend, unless they get their LB issue squared away, Olsen could break out which could make this a really bad weekend for the Texans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
caatfan Newbie

caatfan

Posted
Posted (edited)

Here's the latest from this JamTex idiot. He thinks we only have 2 decent players- Cam on offense and Luke on D. As for Luke, I think it's most likely that he plays. 

"If Luke K is out for the Panthers defense, their defense is full of holes. 
The Panthers have no other real weapons. They are average at best without Luke.
Looks like he most likely won't be playing because of concussion protocols. 
Cam can't win it on his own, and the Texans are allot more to handle on both sides of the ball then the Jaguars."

 

Edited by caatfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites
zacka77ack Rising Star

zacka77ack

Posted
Posted

 

I agree with you on everything sans Shaq Thompson.  Shaq is way to unknown and for a long period last week was so non-existent that I didn't know he was even on the field.  That said, our defense will be fine against a Fosterless Texans team ran by either a Browns castoff or a cocaine addict.  Their defense could cause problems, but with how terribly they covered Kelce last weekend, unless they get their LB issue squared away, Olsen could break out which could make this a really bad weekend for the Texans.

that's because Shaq WAS non existent. He only played 17 snaps because of the personal that the Jags were using.  Shaq is a wild card, a utility knife. He's an asset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted

Fwiw, only one guy said something really stupid.  Here was Texan fan response to him. 

I am always somewhat surprised by other fan's lack of general football knowledge, but then I must remember that that such ignorance is cherry-picked. 

Yeah, it is just one guy.  Here is what one of their fans said in response.

Im not sure how much you follow other teams, but the panthers have a very good defense. They may not be splashy and get a lot of airtime on espn, but look at their stats and you will see they have a defense that you need to worry about.

You said the same thing about the KC defense without knowing or checking and look what happened. Please do some research on teams before you break out the kool aid and pom poms proclaiming easy victories.

I'm pretty sure Luke will pass the concussion protocol and will play Sunday. If he does LOOK OUT! He's one of if not the best LB in the game right now, and even if he doesn't play that defense will still give you fits if you're not prepared

What are all of these "holes" their defense that you speak of?

 

Most of their fans seem fairly realistic, but I do think this will be a tough game for us. 

 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
O-Ther Newbie

O-Ther

Posted
Posted

Houston's D will be the toughest or 2nd toughest we face all year behind Seattle's. I expect Luke to pass the protocols and lead a turnover feast against a team that has 2 starting QBs, which in football math means they don't have 1, along with no Arian Foster and no Andre Johnson opposite DeAndre Hopkins. Texan fans will say WR Nate Washington had more yards (105) than Hopkins (98) so our secondary should watch out. Pffft. Josh, Bene, and Peanut ain't sweating that WR group.

Calling a defensive slugfest won by Gano. Gonna be a lot of conservative play-calling from Shula and that's the smart move. Game will hinge on which offense screws up less and takes better advantage of turnovers both defenses will give them. We can at least threaten in both running and passing. Who does Houston have at RB now? Exactly my point

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basbear
      Albert Breer talks about Dave Canales

      By Basbear · Posted

      Very Odd, seems someone is lying about the "love" between Seattle and canales.  I did read some about B.johnson and he said he wanted a stable good job and that 5 out 8 teams that filled this past season, will be open again in three years. I somewhat get his point, but he's lost millions the past two years waiting. Plus great job are never open cause great team don't fire their HCs. He put lots of time and sweat into the lions and wanted to enjoy the good times longer.    I do think tepper made other coaches not want to be here. That all-star staff had as you stated had connections around the league and coaches are no different when someone contracts them and goes " How was it Carolina ??'.... " Love the area, hated the work environment/owner". They did get Brian Callahan to interview and had a 2nd one lined up, but in just one interview titans hired him. I'd much rather had him or just name evero HC instead.  Nobody wanted Ron Rivera either and he interviewed everywhere. No one wants this job..... even the jags got recent SB winning Doug Peterson.... I truly think Carolina coaching rep is in the dump and they fuged up waiting for Callahan. Panic move. This is my pure guess too, Jim Caldwell is the acting/real HC and canales is the OC.
    • strato
      Albert Breer talks about Dave Canales

      By strato · Posted

      I go back to the hole the Panthers put themselves in and his positive track record with getting production from ‘problem’ QBs. Which, we have one.  I go to the idea people were putting forth on these younger HC prospects - that maybe you take a guy early and let him grow and give him all the help you can. Like a QB go figure. I think that is pretty much where it is right now. I think Canales could be good.   
    • Waldo
      Albert Breer talks about Dave Canales

      By Waldo · Posted

      It's like with Friterer was the same as Canales. 'He's a great guy' and everyone loves him but Seattle had a HC opening with ties and no interview, even with a playoff appearance in a weak NFCS to boost his name. The NFL is all about ties and connections. It's so much more a small pond than most sectors could be so the corporate NFL bs is sooooo much thicker. All of those openings and no HC interviews? B Johnson is an anomaly, like a Kiffin, where usually you have guys that will go whereever to take a promotion even if it looks terrible for a distance, Wilks to Arizona comes to mind. It's weird and interesting how the NFL mirrors and then deviates from the rest of corporate America in their MOs. 
×
×
  • Create New...