Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

with all of this trade talk


juliosantos

Recommended Posts

ive been seeing alot of trade talk ideas from us fans in the last couple weeks . people wanting smitty back anquan old man boldin . while i dont think its likely we make a trade for a receiver it can help us make a superbowl run no doubt. the really only one i would be willing to trade for is cordarrelle patterson , i remember alot of people wanting this guy including myself  when he came out . he is from rockhill sc  and hes basically a bigger version of ginn thats drowned in a deep wr depth chart which got even bigger with that beast stephon diggs now coming along. i doubt he would be cheap maybe a 4th rounder at most for someone whose upside is sky high , he helps in the present and in the future for when we get  the monster back aka kb . once again doubt it happens but it does happen he should be our guy not no old washed up anquan boldone 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long will it take for a new wr to learn the playbook is the question.  Norwell is still riding the pine cause of it right?  Idk. More weapons the better, just wouldnt want it to be a waste of time, draft pick or roster spot.

Prett sure you're referring to Norwood, as Norwell the ManBeast mauls opponents on the regular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long will it take for a new wr to learn the playbook is the question.  Norwell is still riding the pine cause of it right?  Idk. More weapons the better, just wouldnt want it to be a waste of time, draft pick or roster spot.

Patterson still has trouble with the Vikings playbook. He's as dumb as a brick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Patterson still has trouble with the Vikings playbook. He's as dumb as a brick.

It blows my mind how many people don't see how useless the guy is.  It would take 3 years, of him being on our PS, for people to realize he sucks.  But that's not too surprising I guess... some people are still on board with the Stephen Hill project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It blows my mind how many people don't see how useless the guy is.  It would take 3 years, of him being on our PS, for people to realize he sucks.  But that's not too surprising I guess... some people are still on board with the Stephen Hill project.

go look at pattersons numbers his rookie year and then go look at Hills entire career.

not even fair to compare the two. Patterson had star written all over him after his very productive rookie year. He probably won't turn into a star but you can't help but notice how good he was his rookie year and how good he is with the ball in his hands. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the beauty of our offense, we currently do not need a superstar WR for it to work.  We run the ball almost 50% of the time, and oh by the way have the #1 rushing offense in the league.  We are #6 in points per game at 27.0, and have moved the ball against any defense so far at will.  We have role players, and we just take what the defense gives us.  We're 6-0, let's not fix what ain't broke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...