Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Packers against QBs that can run


Verge

Recommended Posts

So far this year, they have faced three quarterbacks with running abilities, they have struggled mightily and clearly do not have someone on the defense that can spy.

 

Three running quarterbacks:

26 carries, 168 yards, 6.4 YPC.

Cam and Mike Shula are most likely licking their chops watching the tape.

 

Not to mention, the last three games versus the running attack in general, it looks like this:

90 carries, 409 yards, 4.5 yards a carry. If you take away a terrible Chargers running attack it looks a lot better. We should be running on them all game long.

 

They are also one of the worst teams in covering good receiving tight ends, they haven't been able to contain them all season long. This matchup is very good for us and we can win it if we avoid turnovers and keep A-Rod on edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said it earlier in the week. Win the turnover battle, control TOP, and pressure Rodgers, we win.

Also, expect Cam to go off in a big way. I'm expecting an absolutely terrific day for him, barring dropped passes plaguing us. Just a gut feeling, no real rhyme or reason. I'm not at all worried for us defensively, I think we'll survive just fine on that front and be able to contain their offense so long as the offense keeps our defense off of the field for extended periods of time. If we can average 5 minute drives this game, man that'd be huge. That's assuming we get about 2.5 possessions per quarter. With GB not having the greatest rushing attack, we may get 3-4 possessions per quarter even. If that happens, that means our defense is getting 3 and outs consistently throughout the game, which means we have to maximize our possessions and get points. Get 2 TDs up and I am fine with field goals, because our defense is going to play out of it's mind this game. Gotta think they have a bad taste in their mouth with Luck moving the ball like he did in the 4th and OT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The game plan really does need to be "run the damn ball", but I will lose my facilities if they come out and just continue to run three straight up the gut and out in three. Yes, you need to run the dive to keep them honest, they just could use a little more creativity in how they call the counters, tosses and draws. I remember when Stew and Williams both rushed for over 1K, it was because they were able to pop it outside and take advantage of the over pursuit from the DE. With that said, I know that DE's are a lot less likely to over pursue with Cam and his running ability, but there has to be a way to create opportunities on the edge. I also know Stew is a power runner, but he does have good speed and vision. Just babbling.... Don't mind me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...