Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton is Darrell Waltrip; and, Six Things to Do to the Falcons


PhillyB
 Share

Recommended Posts

I loved DW.  He was my favorite.  Those DW/DE matchups in the 1980's were classic.

Quote

 

Of course, to continue to win, the Panthers need to beat the Atlanta Falcons on Sunday. To that end, here are ten things the Panthers need to turn up a home field victory:

1) show up

2) show up

3) show up

4a) show up

4b) show up

5) show up

6) show up

 

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww HELL naw, you done gone and did it.  Queue the Bad Joo-Joo BrainWave Believers coming in here to tell you that because you're not taking the Falcons "seriously" we will now lose and it will be YOUR fault.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are finally seeing because they are actually looking. The usual, "Hey, ESPN is on! Oh wow, that Cam guy is a selfish, showy thug." is over. They are paying attention. They are seeing him win. They are seeing him have fun. They are hearing others speak well of him. He will soon be the best and most respected in the league. We all knew it would happen, it was just a matter of when.

Panthers- 38

Falcons- 13

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And @PhillyB proves his cultural prowess once again. Gotta be honest bro, you didn't strike me as the type to know a lick about NASCAR. An archeologist with tats? and a beard that makes you look like you just walked out of an Irish pub? Not to mention very independent political views that dont necessarily match the typical NASCAR demographic? You, sir, have just blown my mind and expanded my consciousness.

mind-blown.gif.2388dd3f873bed80a0224d0f4

For that, I salute you. Nice work PhillyB. My only prediction for the game is that the Falcons are gonna walk in thinking they can pull a fast one on us. They'll play hard and probably play dirty for the first half. But much like the Titans, Redskins, or Cowboys there will come a point where we make them succumb to our will and we absolutely dominate them. Our boys on defense are probably pizzed off for their lackluster showing last week. Norman always gets hype to play against Julio. And Cam has this offense riding high without its top target. No score prediction from me. It's the one thing I get superstitious about if I haven't done my research. But I think it will be a highly enjoyable game for Panthers fans.

Go Panthers and Keep fuging Pounding!

Edited by UpstatePanther
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...