Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patrick Peterson Says The Cardinals "Owe" The Panthers


Saca312

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Meh...apparently everybody "owes" the panthers. I just find it funny how all these players are calling us out but you hear nobody talking about the Broncos and they are the defending Champs lol. 

Why would they?  Win the Super Bowl?  Time to rebuild baby!!!!!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So here's  what the Cards will have to do:

1. Play us before December, when old man winter comes to collect on Carson Palmer.  The NFL obliged them there.

2. They will have to protect Carson Palmer.  What have they done for their Oline?

3. They will have to stop our running game, completely.  Good luck there...

4. They will have to stop KB, Funchess, Ginn, Olsen, Stewart and Tolbert in the passing game.  Die deep?  Die intermediate?  Get chewed up short?

5. They can't make ANY mistakes.  Period.

Hyperbole aside - the Cards are a good team, but we were A LOT better last year than they thought they were.  While we did lose Norman, we haven't gotten much worse.  Has AZ gotten a lot better?  Now they could always come out and beat us because it's their super bowl, or we have a bad game, or whatever.  They shouldn't expect to out play us though.  We are getting used to winning, and I think the guys like it.

I'm so looking forward to this season!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Saca312 said:

So Patrick Peterson feels they owe the Panthers. Says the star guys didn't play their best the second time, tried making insane plays, and other excuses. Read if you must:

 

Technically we owed them for 2008....but they kinda owe us the last two.......carry the 4........ok, yes.....they owe us 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Khaki Lackey said:

Yeah. You might want to wait and talk trash when you get a QB under 60 that doesn't choke like Mama Cass in the playoffs.

 

edit: I realize that Peyton Manning matches that description and beat us...whatever.

Really the NFL was just sending him off on a high note. Kinda like NO breaking legs to get a SB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep he made the comment " I dont know what they were doing out there at that point" in the press conference. Let's be real they all got paid but they also know his system suppresses there offensive potential.
    • Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
×
×
  • Create New...