Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Derek Anderson....David Newton write up


ladypanther

Recommended Posts

 

Quote

 

“It’s the best locker room I’ve ever been in," Anderson said. “It’s the best group of guys I’ve ever been around as far as coming in day in and day out and working. We’ve got a lot of really young guys that enjoy working. That’s not always the case."

That’s why Anderson turned down overtures from other teams that showed interest over the past few seasons.

“I was on so many bad teams and then some frustrating situations," he said. “Why would I put myself in a situation where I could be in a [bad] situation when I can be in a situation with these guys, a good team, a great staff?

 

http://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/210036/derek-anderson-isnt-cam-newton-but-panthers-are-glad-they-have-him

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2016 at 8:29 AM, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Derek Anderson is one of the best QBs the Panthers have ever had on the team and he is our back-up.

Life is good right now for the Carolina Panthers.

That says a lot more about our QB history (or lack thereof) than it does about Derek. Jake in his prime was a borderline top 10 QB. Cam is a stud. Other than that... oh wee mayne. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, RumHam said:

Teams that wish they had Derek Anderson

1. The Super Bowl Winners

2. Bears

3. Niners

4. Cowboys

5. Eagles

6. Rams

7. Texans

8. Falcons

9. Titans

10. Bungals

Seriously? 

The Broncos just traded up to take a QB in the 1st round. The Rams and Eagles just took QBs #1 and #2 overall. At most DA would be a stopgap on a short leash in those places. 

The Texans just gave Osweiler a ton of money. He's their guy at this point. 

The Cowboys have Romo. Despite the jokes, the guy is damn good. They have Foles backing him up who has better production as a starter than DA and is several years younger.

Matt Ryan is a good QB. I know we all like to joke him, but he's an above average starting QB and no one would take DA over Ryan as their starter. 

The Titans have Mariotta who they took #2 overall and has shown good promise. 

The Bengals have Andy Dalton who is a top 10 starting NFL QB. 

Of all the teams you listed, the Niners would be the only shot DA would have to go in and win the job outright and not constantly be looking over his shoulder, but then again with Chip Kelly who knows. 

DA is an above average backup QB. Nothing more, nothing less. We barely squeak by the worst team in the league twice in 2014-2015 with him starting and half of our fans act like hes a top 10 NFL QB. 

 

I guess even when you have the reigning NFL MVP at QB, the backup QB is still the most beloved player on the roster... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...