Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When was the last time this place was so quiet about our 1st round pick?


davos

Recommended Posts

First off--this is not a dig at Butler. I think he has the ceiling to be an absolute monster and today's NFL should center around the interior DL, OL, QB and front 7 in general. We are positioning ourselves very well.

 

My question though--what are we expecting from this kid? We have guys in Specific roles in Star, KK, Paulie S, etc but where does big Vern fit in? I see no talk about his performance, potential or anything and he was our top pick this draft. First time in forever that's been the dealio.

whatcha got peeps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've went back and watched most of his snaps over the last three games. He has been underwhelming, which is putting it mildly. 

It doesn't look like he is playing with much leverage and is getting stood up at the line a good deal.  I'd also say he still has a lot to learn about the position at the pro level  

Luckily for us, he doesn't have to step in and be a monster. He can get some great coaching from Washington and can watch star and KK do work on Sunday's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Like Short, Butler is gonna need time too. Things in here are gonna be quiet on the Butler front for the next two seasons. 

Short made an impression right away, at least once the season started, but the team also had way more need at the position and Short came from a bigger program. Agreed through that Butler is on a longer curve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, davos said:

I see no talk about his performance, potential or anything and he was our top pick this draft. First time in forever that's been the dealio.

I think last year was pretty quiet too re: Shaq.  He was brought along quite slowly because of missing most of OTAs due to Washington being on the quarter system and his finishing school.  We didn't NEED Shaq to start at LB, so we had the luxury to give him time to grow over the season.

I assume we'll do exactly the same with Butler.

It's a very good place to be when you don't need to start your first round pick, but can give them maximum potential to grow and develop,  It's clear DG is looking a few years ahead now that he has breathing room of a solid roster and some Cap space.  Sure, we'll be starting at least 1 rook at CB this year, but in our scheme, we can probably get away with that.

Generally teams starting several rookies at key positions don't make the playoffs.  When you think to where this franchise was in 2012, it's amazing we have the luxury to develop guys for the long-term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Was pretty quiet last year too. 

I was in Denver last year so my memory is a little iffy ( :) ) but Shaq generated a TON of discussion around and after the draft. Impact wise, yeah he wasn't felt immediately but there was still a good deal of talk about him up until September.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...