Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bradberry at practice. Do you sit Worley or McClain?


Leeroy Jenkins PhD

Recommended Posts

McClain. Worley's balled out and the plan was always to have him and Bradberry starting until Worley started out a little slow. Now that he's up to speed it should be him, Bradberry and LJ locked into the nickel spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Growl said:

Arizona went after Worley every time they needed a play last week and he let them back into it in the second half.

 

I sit him. Let McClain play.

Worley had a ton of great plays too last week, has higher upside than McClain and we're playing Goff. I'll start the rookies who Gettleman drafted to be our CBs for years to come. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Growl said:

Arizona went after Worley every time they needed a play last week and he let them back into it in the second half.

 

I sit him. Let McClain play.

he's the future and isn't going to get better sitting on the bench. He has improved every week and I'm excited to see him continue to improve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How bad do these rookies need to get beat before people realize they are a liability? They are not balling out. They do not have a ton of great plays. They are being exploited every game and the LBs have to cover up for their problems.

They have yet to learn to communicate and read the QB. CBs are a 3 year process. The only thing you expect from them in year 1 is not to make communication errors and look lost on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How bad do these rookies need to get beat before people realize they are a liability? They are not balling out. They do not have a ton of great plays. They are being exploited every game and the LBs have to cover up for their problems.

They have yet to learn to communicate and read the QB. CBs are a 3 year process. The only thing you expect from them in year 1 is not to make communication errors and look lost on the field.



I'd say the only thing you expect from them in year 1 IS TO MAKE communication errors and look lost on the field.

If anything, you want them to show that they physically belong, while improving technically as the season progresses.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to have to keep watching Worley because I like him a lot but can't help but think he's the new Tre Boston. I've seen several folks say he's balled out but literally every time I've watched him during a play he gets blown up.

I finished rewatching the 1st qtr of the ARI game to check out Daryl Williams, Kony Ealy, and Worly. Through the first quarter I saw Worley give a huge cushion to the WR (5+ yards) that was either ultra conservative coaching or ultra conservative play. Then he got caught looking at the QB and lost his man (fortunately Palmer didn't see it).

I think what bothers me is that he's looked at best serviceable and at worst fuging terrible.

Really hope I'm wrong... Getting both outside CBs for the long term in the 2nd & 3rd rounds of the same draft? Ok, I'll take that.

Sent from my SM-G900V using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...