Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: Bradberry is better than Norman


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I personally don't compare Norman to Bradberry. I compare Norman to Worley. In my dream life, we keep the franchise on Norman, draft Bradberry as his future replacement in the same round. And they are both keeping us in games this year as our d-line deteriorates in front of our eyes. That, my friends, would have been what was best for the Panthers this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

I personally don't compare Norman to Bradberry. I compare Norman to Worley. In my dream life, we keep the franchise on Norman, draft Bradberry as his future replacement in the same round. And they are both keeping us in games this year as our d-line deteriorates in front of our eyes. That, my friends, would have been what was best for the Panthers this year. 

This. People act like we only play one CB.

Once we made the decision to tag him and free agency had essentially played itself out, we should've held onto Norman and let him play the season under the tag. By the time we made the decision to pull the tag, there was no one available at any of our need positions be it CB, DE, or OT.

With that that said, we'd still suck with Norman. This OL is the perfect poo storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

I personally don't compare Norman to Bradberry. I compare Norman to Worley. In my dream life, we keep the franchise on Norman, draft Bradberry as his future replacement in the same round. And they are both keeping us in games this year as our d-line deteriorates in front of our eyes. That, my friends, would have been what was best for the Panthers this year. 

What could have been...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...