Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Joe Mixon definitely off of our draft board?


t96

Recommended Posts

Ridiculously good player who's one of the best backs in this stacked class and if not for the off the field incident would be a definite first round pick. Question is obviously his character though and I wonder if his situation is one that we'll definitely stay away from, and would love for @Jeremy Igo to chime in. I don't know a whole lot about him other than his on the field play but it seems to me that his only issue off the field was one incident that happened when he had just turned 18 and he punched a woman in a Deli. Here's the video of it:

 

 

The girl shoves him, he lunged at her than she slapped him and he responded with a punch. I don't know what the hell started this whole thing and his reaction was clearly over the top and he deserved the misdemeanor, counseling and community service he had to do but she did start the physical altercation, twice. Is this really something that would take him off of our board entirely? There's talk of him falling to day 3 or out of the draft entirely because of this, and any team who gets him will have an absolute steal when considering his talent. Maybe I don't know enough about him but one incident like this when he was barely 18 years old that he didn't even start doesn't scream to me that he'll have any other problems off the field going forward. If there's more than this incident then that's another thing but I haven't heard of anything else.

 

Obviously for us this is much more serious than other teams with Carruth and then Hardy being on JR's mind, but it's a little different when it's a college player coming in like Mixon and we've already shown last draft that we'd take somebody who has a bit of a history in Worley. Obviously can't equate Mixon and Worley but Worley shows that we won't stay away from it entirely, we'll look at the facts of the situation and make a decision. I just don't see how DG could pass this guy up if he's sitting there in the 3rd still. Any thoughts on this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2nd best RB talent wise behind Fournette.  Same Size and speed pretty much indentical to Zeke.  No way he lands a panther.  There's a better chance we trade Cam And Luke aaay this draft than drafting Mixon.  Really could see him going to Seattle.  The guy that has left a void there retiring had some baggage when Seattle traded for him and Carrol is a guy who gives guys second chances

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wary, but not dead against it. This happened in July 2014 when he was barely 18. He served a years suspension, and there has been no other issues with him that I am aware of. basically, he fugged up (BADLY) as a kid, and pulled his punishment. I don't think that should prevent us from drafting him years later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he is off a ton of teams boards the current culture of the US is just not going to allow this to go away. that said NFL teams have shown some willingness to put college transgression in the past as long as you play well and dont do it again. IE Tyreek Hill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

I'm wary, but not dead against it. This happened in July 2014 when he was barely 18. He served a years suspension, and there has been no other issues with him that I am aware of. basically, he fugged up (BADLY) as a kid, and pulled his punishment. I don't think that should prevent us from drafting him years later. 

I agree and I think it'd be tough to find many football fans who would be against their team drafting him on day 2 or later. Question is though will JR let it happen if DG does his evaluations and thinks it would be worth it to take Mixon at some point? Or would DG and Ron and their staff not want him anyways?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jumpman910 said:

 Some team is going to get CRAZY value drafting in a later round. 

This, some team can take a flyer on him.  Heck it worked out well in Arizona and Honey badger.  He was suspended then kicked off the team sat out a year, kid turned his poo around one of the best players in the game.

Kid is a beast though so whoever take a fly on him late could get a top of the line steal

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BPA comes with the caveat of positional value and roster need included. Never let the latter two completely overwhelm the first, however. Our FO seems to lean heavily into "WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POTENTIALZ!!!" as a fourth category and often it seems as the #1 overall pursuit. With as many needs as this roster has, I am not going to get upset over a real roster upgrade at WR versus some reach at EDGE or whatever other extreme needs we have. Overall, I want to see the roster get better. There is far, far, FAR more than one offseason of work left to get this roster into the top 10-12 in the NFL. That should be the goal. 
    • I would say we are more likely to get smoked by Tampa, blast Seattle and then perplexingly lose to Tampa again. 
    • In general, Dave Canales tends to target his TE's the least frequently of any position group(WR/RB/TE) during his three years of running an NFL offense.  However, if you notice this percentage has crept up over time. 2025 is the first year that TE has eclipsed RB in target percentage. Production has also gone up in 2025. This is a percentage of total output in each category. Canales has always used a very TE heavy offense. In fact, on average his offensive formations are 2 or 3 TE sets roughly 80% of all offensive formations. So, the question may be, with this uptick in total TE output, could an elite or top tier TE make a significant impact? I believe there is some evidence this may be the case. Here are a look at TE snaps and Cade Otten specifically. These are the snap percentages for all rostered TE's in every Dave Canales offense. The bolded cell is Cade Otten's whopping 96.46% of total snap counts in the single year he was in the Dave Canales offense in Tampa. This was overwhelmingly his career high. His production was higher with less utilization in 2024, however.    In conclusion, while I don't anticipate ever seeing a top 5 producing/Pro Bowl caliber TE performance in a Dave Canales offense, there does appear to be some evidence that an actual upgrade in our TE room would actually lead to increasing overall offensive efficiency. I think Otten's utilization rate does indicate that the splitting of time between our relatively even TE group would cede significant snaps if a far superior option were available. I believe this is an area we could(and should have this past offseason/draft) made a more concerted effort to get a dynamic TE threat, after the apparent failure that J. Sanders appears to have been.  
×
×
  • Create New...