Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade KB for a first next year?


t96

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

It is insane how you are literally the contrarian to everything on this forum

Because suggesting you get rid of a guy that has over 130 receptions nearly 2,000 yards and 16 TDs in his first two seasons, one after an acl injury is dumb. His first two season are comparable to guys like Julio and AJ Green. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, AceBoogie said:

Because suggesting you get rid of a guy that has over 130 receptions nearly 2,000 yards and 16 TDs in his first two seasons, one after an acl injury is dumb. His first two season are comparable to guys like Julio and AJ Green. 

I'm mostly with you on this one, but...anyone is expendable for the right price.

KB has his issues, but he is still a solid receiver that can be markedly better. At least with him, we know what we have. I don't think that we can say the same for any other receiver on the roster (except for maybe Bersin). I really want to see what Funchess and Garrett can bring to the table being that they seem to be from that same mold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is so fuging stupid. KB is our #1 WR with all his problems included. Funchess is much less reliable catching the ball and has even worse YAC, and who do we have behind them? Some bench riders from other teams and a Samuel the rookie who has yet to prove he can do anything in the NFL yet?

That we be the single most idiotic thing you could do to this team besides somehow getting rid of Cam. We don't have any reliable receiving threats besides Olsen and KB, and you want to axe one of them for a draft pick you wont even see until next year??

I know Samuel and McCaffrey will aid in the recieving game, but you can't rely on rookies who haven't played a down yet over people who have already shown they can perform at  a high level. Yeah KBs performance leaves more to be desired sometimes, but he's still way too huge of an asset in the passing game to just give up .

I wouldn't do it unless we had at least 2 bonified very reliable good WR . We have currently 1 of those, and even KB  very loosely fits that definition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long game or Short game?

 

1st:  There is no chance a team is willing to part with an 18 1st for KB.

2nd:  Are we building for the next  5-7 or going "all in" over the next 3?

 

If we are going all in, no you can't trade him.  If we are playing the long game expecting Cam to play for another 8-10 years at a high level....yes, you trade him for a 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, the whole rationale used  for the high IQ point guard is it would allow us to spend our resources elsewhere….instead it’s all our first rounders ever since to support the bad pick.  Reality is our front office is just bad.  If you wanted Bryce Young you were going to need to do something unique and special for him.  Instead we just insert a QB with traditional tools into old NFL concepts that pair with traditional talent and our pass game is whack
    • Good to see some other folks are speaking the same language on this. It's simple common sense. But it seems like there's a disconnect due to the misplaced value the team has put on Thielen because he was the only vaguely good veteran WR willing to sign with the Panthers after we traded away DJ Moore. That time has come and gone. We have two first round WR's on the roster now.
    • Yeah I’m turning this into a Bryce can’t play QB thread. Just stating that offense was a poo show two years ago. No QB is succeeding in that, much less a rookie. I feel like it’s become a common debate strategy on here to just jump down the rabbit hole of saying he is just bad in so many ways when any certain point gets countered. If that doesn’t work we can deflect to how poorly this team has been ran. In regards to the actual point we are debating, the OL was struggling, half of the skill players aren’t on a roster, Mingo has done nothing with his new team and the staff are either not coaching or on their 3rd team in 3 years, aside from McCown (I liked McCown too). Honestly about as bad as it gets. No need to try to state how good of an offense it was billed it because that has been proven false at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...