Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Curtis Samuel vs CMC


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

Coming out they were both compared to each other some saying Samuel was a poor mans CMC. Me personally I feel better about Samuel at this point than CMC(fumble withstanding eeew) because to me he passes the eyeball test. He flashes game breaking speed, his hands look solid and he still is learning the playbook. Slowly but surely he is being brought along into the offense.

 

I think it’s only a matter of time before he catches one of those weekly deep balls. CMC on the other hand is breaking down and his role being decreased almost everywhere. I don’t think we have seen a worse first rounder in terms of blocking in recent memory, and I am almost at the point of saying I would rather see Samuel get his carries at RB. CMC need to just start preparing for his future as a Wes Welker/Edelman type and be done with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, csx said:

I haven't been impressed by Samuel at all.  He seems to play timid

Really? Seems he gets 10 yards every time he does the reverse. And as someone above said he does make a man miss and displays decent hands.... haven’t seen him drop any. And on those deep balls I can atleast see the long speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, KendrickPanther said:

CMC is a good football player. Maybe top 10 was to high but he shows 1st round talent. His movement is incredible and many times all he needs is a block or a better pass so he can keep moving.

I still think CMC will be great, just needs a year under his belt, and should add about 10 to 15 pounds of muscle to his frame so he power through defenders more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

Nothing about Samuels hands look “solid”. He’s had 2 or 3 now hit him in the hands and wasn’t able to grab it.

1 in Detroit, 1 against Philly I believe and yesterdays deep ball hit him right in the hand 

 

I believe has caught all the passes he should have caught. You are asking him to make the difficult catches which I would agree he hasn’t. Which is why I said they look solid. When he’s open it’s not like he’s dropping passes... he makes the open catches,slants comebacks he’s been money on those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ludwig51 said:

What If we switch it up put cmc at wr and Samuel in the back field 

This is what I was thinking... worth a try... maybe we had the formula right just switch around the equation... I don’t think CMC is a natural runningback. He was probably groomed from birth on route running and catching the football like his daddy,only to be placed at runningback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...