Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How Bad Is The Packers Red-Zone Defense? They're 32nd In The NFL And Allow 100% Of RZ Drives Turn Into A Score.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Their biggest weakness is their pass defense and that's our biggest weakness on  offense. They have a poo OL so if we can blitz Rodgers we should sack him fairly easily.

Ya know unless Rivera sucks like he normally does and has the CBs play 15 yards back to allow Rodgers to easily pass it to a WR who doesn't have a defender within 15 yards of him. Which he will do and easily convert since his WRs aren't trash WRs and Rodgers is one of the best.

You have to be up on the WRs and blitz him until he taps out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Well...

 

I think we put up 35-40 points on this D the way our offense is starting to click (meaning Cam has gone ape poo awesome down the stretch). I know some of you are arguing that we weren't really that good last week except for a few big plays, but the vikes are a damned good Defensive unit, so I call BS to that argument. Granted, if Rodgers is anywhere near 100%, he'll get his, but I think we outscore them because our D is better, plain and simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

I think we put up 35-40 points on this D the way our offense is starting to click (meaning Cam has gone ape poo awesome down the stretch). I know some of you are arguing that we weren't really that good last week except for a few big plays, but the vikes are a damned good Defensive unit, so I call BS to that argument. Granted, if Rodgers is anywhere near 100%, he'll get his, but I think we outscore them because our D is better, plain and simple.

Cams passing stats and our downfield passing game have been bad for 95 percent of the whole season. Im wondering what will happen when we have a game when the run game gets shut down 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People like to poo on shula but we put up 30 on a Vikings Defense that feels a bad day is 17 points. This is probably the easiest defense we have faced since the Dolphins. If our defense can get to Rodgers and our offense keeps the gas on we should win this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Snake said:

People like to poo on shula but we put up 30 on a Vikings Defense that feels a bad day is 17 points. This is probably the easiest defense we have faced since the Dolphins. If our defense can get to Rodgers and our offense keeps the gas on we should win this. 

turnovers and 2 huge run plays were big into contributing to that total. Its not like we methodically drove down the field for every TD.  You generally win when you win the turnover battle whatever the other circumstances of the game might be, and Vikings made it easier by dropping of multiple TDs or big downfield passes

Answer is somewhere in the middle. We certainly didn't blow them out by any means. Even with all those turnovers and huge gashing runs game was still tied late in the 4th. It was far from a masterpiece from Rivera and Shula who were sitting on a less than 2 score lead for alot of the game

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • agree to disagree you are entitled to that opinion even though I find the argument completely bizarre based on data. I could type out a long paragraph discussing those areas but what’s the point. I posted a screenshot that showed Bryce in a similar post snap situation with a free rusher in his face which resulted in a TD - that’s what happened on the play so I posted it. 
    • I've already addressed this notion in a previous reply. You are basing your assertion outside reality if you think Bryce would have not only been more successful but defeated the Patriots in place of Herbert. Bryce got blown off the field by that Patriots team with the highest paid OL in the league. We've seen Bryce with an OL that gave up 65 sacks and it resulted in the #1 pick. And that is not a defense of Herbert or arguing he is a great QB in any way. He has physical talent but he has been similar to Darnold early in his career in terms of his very up and down perfomances. However that does not change the fact that they have significantly less invested in the OL than the Panthers.
    • I think Tepper has been setting the stage where pending there is no miracle he wipes it all clean.  Think you already have been told that with small things like Evero staying.  Bryce is the guy next year.  OC, DC, everything stays the same.  QB room largely the same.  Nothing would really matter there.  They basically get one more shot and it goes how the schedule paired with our 27th ranked O predictably most likely goes.  Everyone out the door together.  Bryce is a bridge tier QB.  I don’t see Dave surviving where he could be bridge QB here in reality. 
×
×
  • Create New...