Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers run game was first in yards before contact per attempt


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Well what do you make of this?  

http://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2018/02/09/panthers-led-nfl-in-yards-before-contact-per-attempt/

"According to Jeff Ratcliffe at Pro Football Focus, the Panthers led the league last season in yards before contact per attempt, averaging 1.91."

 

What are the takeaways? Tim Weaver at USA Today gives some credit to Stew and CMC,  but I'm thinking that something is amiss.  

Wouldn't it be nice to know more?  Well,  here you go via PFF. 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/fantasy-football-2017-best-offensive-lines-in-yards-before-contact

 

"An easy way to quantify the amount of space an offensive line creates in the run game is with yards before contact. Likewise, yards after contact gives us an indication of a running back’s performance independent of his blocking."

 

And here is my issue with those thinking that CMC is magically going to be the solution as a bell-cow back. 

 

"The Panthers paced the league this year with 1.91 yards before contact per attempt. This likely comes as a surprise, considering the fact that Christian McCaffrey and Jonathan Stewartboth averaged under 4.0 yards per carry. Of course, neither player was effective after contact. Stewart averaged 2.23 yards after contact per attempt, which ranked 45th out of 53 qualifiers with at least 25 percent of team carries. McCaffrey was even worse, finishing 50th with 2.11 yards after contact per attempt."

 

So, I don't really know what to make of all this stuff,  except that (like Weaver said) Norwell is a beast.  I think that we really do need to look at a back seriously.  We just have so many holes that need filling that who knows what the hell we should do in the first?

Perhaps taking some of those eight-man fronts away by having another one or two legitimate receivers will help. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's yards before the first contact on a play I'm guessing .

It doesn't matter if you get 2 yards before being contacted if you are immediately met by 5 men after that 2 seconds is up 

Maybe other teams have shorter times before the first contact , but then they meet less people when contacted, or more people are being blocked effectively 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most runs, they were being tackled by 2+ defenders on first contact. That comes from running iso and not getting your OL second level quickly. This was largely due to Norwell having to hold on to his block a second longer because M. Kalil is terrible. And because we lost R. Kalil half the season. 

Bottom line: new system, better play calling, better production even with our current OL. I'm thinking we're improving it before camp though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pantha-kun said:

That's yards before the first contact on a play I'm guessing .

It doesn't matter if you get 2 yards before being contacted if you are immediately met by 5 men after that 2 seconds is up 

Maybe other teams have shorter times before the first contact , but then they meet less people when contacted, or more people are being blocked effectively 

This.

People bash Stew but ignore the facts he's led the league in rushing attempts into stacked boxes the last 2 seasons.

Again showing the important of addressing the need for WR, and explosive one at that.  As long as there is zero threat and defenses are over confident that their CBs can hold 1 on 1.  Teams will still continue to stack the box

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, stbugs said:

And Stewart’s best run of the season was 60 yards before contact.

I’m sorry but something is amiss with the Panthers being the best at the run last year. The early weeks were awful run wise. How many runs did we watch where the RBs were met behind the line?

We sure did see a lot of 2nd and 12s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Pantha-kun said:

That's yards before the first contact on a play I'm guessing .

It doesn't matter if you get 2 yards before being contacted if you are immediately met by 5 men after that 2 seconds is up 

Maybe other teams have shorter times before the first contact , but then they meet less people when contacted, or more people are being blocked effectively 

This. It's truly a terrible stat. Any co-ordinator and any line can engineer plays where the point of contact is pushed. But when that push comes via a huge investment of bodyweight that simultaneously a.) makes clear the point of attack, and b.) fails to effectively handle the second level, all you're doing is turning your RB into a lineman who happens to have the ball. Stuff city. Every middle schooler knows this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...