Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bad news for that other Jerry


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Might not mean anything regarding Richardson, but I have to admit it does make me wonder if the league would want to penalize him higher than what we expect.

If disagreeing with the commissioner's salary is "conduct detrimental", what are sexual harassment, racism and failure to report non-disclosure agreements?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

i don't see how this would come to fruition. Goodell works for the owners. If an owner didn't want to extend him he has every right to voice his opinion. Goodell is an idiot for even attempting this bc it just makes him look like a power crazed loser

I have to fully agree with this.  When the employees can start fining their employer for not wanting to extend their employment or for even giving them a raise, that is turning the world upside down.  I know it isn't politically correct to say, but if this does happen, it is a prime example of the old adage about the patients running the asylum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Panthers8969 said:

i don't see how this would come to fruition. Goodell works for the owners. If an owner didn't want to extend him he has every right to voice his opinion. Goodell is an idiot for even attempting this bc it just makes him look like a power crazed loser

JJ is nothing more than a motormouth that thinks the NFL goes his way and it don't. Does he have a seat among the committee? No. Is he even remotely part of the committee. No. So why does he have a say in anything if he has no part of the NFL Committee anyway?. JJ is nothing more than a womanizing drunken lush alcoholic 24/7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Panthers8969 said:

i don't see how this would come to fruition. Goodell works for the owners. If an owner didn't want to extend him he has every right to voice his opinion. Goodell is an idiot for even attempting this bc it just makes him look like a power crazed loser

If the other owners agree, then it could happen.  I don't see it happening, but it could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently it's not a fine, but a cost of expenses incurred by the other owners based on his actions and Jones has pay that back. Like if a judge made you pay attorneys fees for the other party in the lawsuit because you were clearly in the wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...