Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who was the better Carolina Panther? Double-trouble addition


Adb6368

Recommended Posts

D will could have been a fringe Hofer had he been the bell cow for us, also if not for the fallout with the organization. Dude consistently averaged over 4.0-4-5 per carry per seasons. Injuries really hampered stew and even then he didn’t have the Homerun ability or vision d will had imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Different players.  I think they are probably the two best running backs we've had in franchise history.  I want Williams in the open field, and Stewart on the goal line. 

If I had to build an offense around one it would probably be Williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its very hard to say, who should've been better? Jonathan Stewart, he was an athletic freak and he was fast for his size before all the injuries, that stiff arm was nasty.

Who was actually better? Deangelo Williams easily. Everytime I watched Jonathan Stewart and thought 'wow, he's better than deangelo, he's going to take over as our #1 back' Deangelo would come in and show that he's just as good and probably better.

Deangelo Williams will probably end up being more underrated in history than Jonathan Stewart I think, and he was better. D. Will shouldve been a HOF'er (they both shouldve if not for J.stew's injuries). Deangelo played big for his size, was strong and pushed forward on contact often and was hard to tackle, had a really good stiff arm although not as good as stew's obviously, and he played fast for his 40 speed. His 40 time isn't very impressive at all, but when you watch his game speed..Deangelo outran people or ran about as fast with the ball in his hands as the 4.3 guys out there. He didn't lose speed with his cuts or change of direction, he had amazing vision, the guy was really incredible.

I always wanted J. Stew to be better than williams and thought he should be, but Williams was always better, he just was regardless of how big of a freak Stew was or how good Stew couldve been. History will forget about them both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RealisticPanther said:

Its very hard to say, who should've been better? Jonathan Stewart, he was an athletic freak and he was fast for his size before all the injuries, that stiff arm was nasty.

Who was actually better? Deangelo Williams easily. Everytime I watched Jonathan Stewart and thought 'wow, he's better than deangelo, he's going to take over as our #1 back' Deangelo would come in and show that he's just as good and probably better.

Deangelo Williams will probably end up being more underrated in history than Jonathan Stewart I think, and he was better. D. Will shouldve been a HOF'er (they both shouldve if not for J.stew's injuries). Deangelo played big for his size, was strong and pushed forward on contact often and was hard to tackle, had a really good stiff arm although not as good as stew's obviously, and he played fast for his 40 speed. His 40 time isn't very impressive at all, but when you watch his game speed..Deangelo outran people or ran about as fast with the ball in his hands as the 4.3 guys out there. He didn't lose speed with his cuts or change of direction, he had amazing vision, the guy was really incredible.

I always wanted J. Stew to be better than williams and thought he should be, but Williams was always better, he just was regardless of how big of a freak Stew was or how good Stew couldve been. History will forget about them both.

want to know a secret?

stewart refused to take the lead dog spot from williams. he held back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...