Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gano signs 4 yr $17 Million w/ $9 Million Guaranteed


SOJA

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

4.25 a year isn’t bad Jesus, where was this same energy when we backed the truck full of money to Matt Kalils door. 

Had a broken foot in 2016 that hampered him, and had a much better 2017, fair deal for both sides

 Yes. Let’s bump that Matt Kalil signing thread. Wanna bet it is many of the same people complaining. And many of the same defending it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

4.25 a year isn’t bad Jesus, where was this same energy when we backed the truck full of money to Matt Kalils door. 

Had a broken foot in 2016 that hampered him, and had a much better 2017, fair deal for both sides

Broken bone in his foot, not broken foot. And it happened in December so it only applied to the last 4 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Ooohhh, I'm not sure I'd go that far.

I've seen enough that I still worry when he goes to kick a field goal. Extra points too.

All but about five of the kickers in the league don't cause their fans to worry each time they go out to kick. Extra points, too. 

But really, who is out there that's available, for under $5 mill a year and is a deadshot? Right. Gano is the guy for the moment. On to bigger issues and worries, like getting the personnel to make touchdowns rather than having to settle for field goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Yes,  but what you're leaving is out is that on average Kasay kicked longer field goals than most,  and the amount was more than double what Graham Gano has kicked.  

In fact, he did not.

John Kasay, career stats:  40-49 yards 120 / 161 (74.5% make) . . . 50+ yards 42 / 83 (50.6% make)

Graham Gano, career stats:  40-49 yards 74 / 92 (80.4% make) . . . 50+ yards 17 / 31 (54.8% make)

You can't blame Gano for not having a 20 year career yet.  But comparing him to Kasay, he's actually slightly better from long range, not quite as good from medium and short.  Pick your poison I guess.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BrianS said:

In fact, he did not.

John Kasay, career stats:  40-49 yards 120 / 161 (74.5% make) . . . 50+ yards 42 / 83 (50.6% make)

Graham Gano, career stats:  40-49 yards 74 / 92 (80.4% make) . . . 50+ yards 17 / 31 (54.8% make)

You can't blame Gano for not having a 20 year career yet.  But comparing him to Kasay, he's actually slightly better from long range, not quite as good from medium and short.  Pick your poison I guess.

 

Comparing him to Kasay is absurd.

You are conveniently omitting the fact that last year we didn't even let him attempt anything above 50. Kasay routinely boomed those with ease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheRed said:

Comparing him to Kasay is absurd.

You are conveniently omitting the fact that last year we didn't even let him attempt anything above 50. Kasay routinely boomed those with ease.

I'm not omitting *anything*.  I'm showing actual career numbers.  Kickers can only go out and kick the field goals that the coach allows them to attempt.  The numbers show that Gano is more accurate than Kasay was on kicks more than 40 yards.

Kasay was a good kicker, one that probably cost us a Lombardi, but a good kicker.  Gano is no less so.  Statistically they are so close to identical that it's not even worth arguing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Gano is the highest paid kicker in the league.  Let that sink in for a minute.

I don't think that is true.  Gostkowski makes more.  And J. Tucker has more guaranteed money.  

https://overthecap.com/position/kicker/

Within two years, Gano will likely be barely top 10 in pay for kickers.   Pay scales tend to escalate rapidly.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BrianS said:

I'm not omitting *anything*.  I'm showing actual career numbers.  Kickers can only go out and kick the field goals that the coach allows them to attempt.  The numbers show that Gano is more accurate than Kasay was on kicks more than 40 yards.

Kasay was a good kicker, one that probably cost us a Lombardi, but a good kicker.  Gano is no less so.  Statistically they are so close to identical that it's not even worth arguing.

You couldn't have watched Kasay kick for us if you actually think Gano is the superior kicker overall. Also, lol @ the Super Bowl jab. Funny you trot that out while saying nothing about Gano missing a gimme on the road in the playoffs.

I think this person might honestly be related to Gano.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheRed said:

You couldn't have watched Kasay kick for us if you actually think Gano is the superior kicker overall. Also, lol @ the Super Bowl jab. Funny you trot that out while saying nothing about Gano missing a gimme on the road in the playoffs.

I think this person might honestly be related to Gano.

I don't know if Gano is the superior kicker overall.  Neither do you.  Not enough career evidence.

The point is that at this point of his career, Gano is on track to be a kicker of the same quality.

As far as Gano missing a "gimme in the playoffs", I did in fact address that by saying that Gano is not as good from close range as Kasay was, but superior from long range.  It's pretty simple.  The numbers are all there if you look at them.

Here, look for yourself:  

http://www.nfl.com/player/grahamgano/71309/careerstats

http://www.nfl.com/player/johnkasay/2501563/careerstats

 

Explain the massive statistical difference between the two.  Because I don't see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One question for those who think this was a smart move.

 

If Gano reverts back to his career average, will you still think this was smart at seasons end, especially when we see we can't cut him until after the following?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ill just be happy if Tepper doesnt make another locker room appearance the rest of the season. 
    • The question I wonder involves putting the cost behind us.      At this point he's here, so does the premium paid even matter anymore? It set expectations no doubt, and they weren't met.  He's been bench-worthy bad, but he's come back and looked first average, above-average to maybe great, and then downright bad again.  Now we're back on a good trend again.  Absolute rollercoaster.   So what level of performance deems him a viable option to hold?  He's looked absolutely incapable of moving an offense at times, and others like a guy you can "Purdy" with some dimes sprinkled in.     So, if he continues on this 2 game trend and shows consistent average to above-average play, we're treading into tricky territory.  Such a big investment but he tops out as a top-15/20 QB option.  It's Alex Smith KC type vibes. Are we going to be sitting at 7-10 come end of season and feel kind of meh? It's right at that fringe of what is worth it.  If he doesn't re-sh*t the bed, we may be best suited to go BPA next draft and see the 2026 progression.  And that will be the final make/break year.  What I can see if he doesn't fall apart and things look manageable: He may end up being the average precursor to finding the great talent that you can build the team around.  How Alex Smith was in KC.  They built that with him (not around him) until they eventually got Mahomes.  Heck, think back to Trent Green/Warner.  So, BY can manage, we may get some success, but if a stud comes along, we bail and roll with the new gun.    
    • We win 2 games largely due to historic rushing from our backup RB we signed in free agency and now the huddle is regarded as the most toxic place on the internet because not everyone shares the same opinion that Bryce Young has proven himself to actually be a long term starting QB yet. This place was just as ugly through the prime Cam years. People complained about him even when he was producing and we were winning the division. Things were just as ugly through the Jake years. Sometimes people would get so irate and fed up with him they would literally be calling for his head. How about we just give eviscerating one another a breather and see how this team and Bryce look on the road. Nothing anyone can say is going to make a difference until then.
×
×
  • Create New...