Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is the realistic ending to 2018 to save everybody's job?


Jangler

Recommended Posts

As much as I think Ron is a decent enough coach he may have to be sacrificed for the greater good of the team.   Whatever it takes to clean out the front office is what I'm hoping for.  I want all remnants of the JR era wiped from this organization completely.  If Ron is part of that so be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, things are still up in the air.  You never know how a new owner is going to think.  Plus,  we haven't  been through free agency, RTC,  OTAs, TC or the preseason,  so it's kind of hard to determine real expectations.  But. At this early in the game,  the only realistic answer that would save "eveybody's" job is a Super Bowl appearance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron just got an extension. He goes nowhere. Hurney would get the boot first. Unless ownership comes in and just wants to nazi the whole thing and can everyone, which isn't a good sign of the future. Even if we go 4-12, Ron is still here for at least two years. The only way that happens is injuries or if Hurney fugs up the offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Ron as a coach - minus the occasional head-scratchers, but I'm content with new ownership implementing their vision for the franchise - assuming they have a strong one.

If letting Ron go is a part of that, it's just part of business.

I've never been a Hurney fan, and I'd love to get a strong GM. I'm hoping new ownership is the type that recognizes talent, puts talent in place, and lets everyone do their work without meddling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Doc Holiday said:

Rofl!!! NFCCG or you’re fired???!!??!!

i really hope the new owners are more reasonable than that. 

They might be. 

Ask yourself this though: How realistic is it to believe a new owner won't want to put their own stamp on the team?

The only instances I can think of where someone came in and just left everything exactly as it was were with family owned teams where ownership passed from one generation to the next. Outside of that, it's pretty common for a new owner to want to remake the team in their own image.

I'd expect everyone to be safe through this season at least. With the coaching staff that's pretty well guaranteed. Business and front office people? Not so much. They can be dumped and replaced anytime after the sale is approved without it necessarily having a major impact.

Lot of things up in the air right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Greatman77 said:

I would flip to this question: How bad would it have to be for Ron to lose his job? Five wins or less?

From that standpoint: When you're talking about new ownership, I wouldn't even guarantee 8-8 saves your job.

Anything less than a winning season is cause to be paranoid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Though I believe a new owner would want to come in and put his stamp on the organization,  I also think that it's a good possibility that they'll probably want to take their time and not upset the applecart but so much, because the Panthers are a pretty good organization.  Short of bombing,  wholesale change may be likely just a message board talking point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...