Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Need two starters from this draft? Simple...


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Round 1 - Safety

Round 2 - Running back

 

These are two positions that have a pretty high hit rate as far as starters as rookies. A safety in round one and a RB in round two would likely fill two positions of need immediately. 

Agreed, a G would be nice too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, KBRed said:

With Matt Kalil as a liability, I wish we could find an OG starter, as hard as that might be. 

Wish we cut Kalil and tagged Norwell for 14 mil. I'd rather overpay Norwell 7 million than Kalil hoping he stays healthy to play at a level we could already do with out him, statistically speaking. We're over paying either way. But guess he's being rewarded for being a long term panther.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lumps said:

Wish we cut Kalil and tagged Norwell for 14 mil. I'd rather overpay Norwell 7 million than Kalil hoping he stays healthy to play at a level we could already do with out him, statistically speaking. We're over paying either way. But guess he's being rewarded for being a long term panther.

100mph toward cap hell. We'd have nearly $25M tied up into two players - one of which wouldn't even be on the roster.

*Oops! Realized you were likely talking about Ryan, not Matt. I think Ryan should've been released, period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's Hurney so we are definitely drafting a RB.

S in the first....this team and Rivera? I'd have to see it to believe it we never draft S's high.

Depending on how it goes obviously there could be several good options from OL, DE, S, WR at our pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Sony to death and agree with you on the need for another back and a FS But looking to 2019 with no Kalil brothers, A line with Moton, Turner, and Williams looks a hell of a lot better with a guy like Isaiah Wynn next to them. 

For me

1. Wynn

2. Bates/Elliott

3. Freeman

We need a plan for this line 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...