Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Don’t overthink this Hurney


Adb6368

Recommended Posts

 

19 minutes ago, Adb6368 said:

A free agent corner looking for work. An all pro LG that likes what he sees. Oh and not to mention he played on a division rival last year so the intel couldn’t hurt. Am I missing something or is this a no brainer?

E7613E2C-3DC6-4D31-9821-DA0C72C290D5.png

This is Trai talking to a friend a former teammate more so than him trying to recruit someone.

Breaux is Louisiana born and raised. He wants to stay in NO. I really don't see him going to any divisional rival honestly. He's not reliable at all rn anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, Breaux is injury prone but he's probably the best CB still on the market and we need a veteran who is able to at least be a stop gap. He seems to fit the bill.

I'm a little worried Hurney will sign Gunther (who is okay) but could probably get a better option for close to the same money..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoping breaux is brought in, I remember when atl let grimes go after his injury and he’s been pretty damn good since. Pick breaux up and draft a cb would be the perfect scenario, a rookie isn’t pressed to come in and be lattimore lite and breaux can split reps with a rookie to either keep him fresh or until he’s up to speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...