Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comp Picks update


t96

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, pantherclaw said:

Have to improve the team. Can't be worried about the comps.

Agree to a degree but you absolutely have to take it into consideration and weigh the costs and benefits. If it costs you the 3rd round comp pick to sign depth on the OL, that’s a bad move. If it costs you a 6th rounder to sign a solid CB to compete for the starting position, then that’s a great move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Agree to a degree but you absolutely have to take it into consideration and weigh the costs and benefits. If it costs you the 3rd round comp pick to sign depth on the OL, that’s a bad move. If it costs you a 6th rounder to sign a solid CB to compete for the starting position, then that’s a great move.

I'm not saying to not consider it, but ya got to fill holes in free agency. 

A comp pick a year later isn't going to fill a hole this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I'm not saying to not consider it, but ya got to fill holes in free agency. 

A comp pick a year later isn't going to fill a hole this year. 

But it might fill a hole next year

And with the money you save by filling a hole with a rookie you can spend on another free agent.  Being competitive next year isn't always the same as being competitive the next 5 years.

Would you be happy trading next years 3rd for Jeremiah Sirles?

I agree that you don't always play the comp game but there are definitely years where based on the free agents you could lose it would benefit you to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thomas96 said:

Yep @Saca312 pretty sure untendered RFAs revert to UFAs.

They don't (at least as qualifying FAs for comp picks).  No worries, the 3rd is still in-tack.  And it is still more valuable than any of the free agents to be brought in at this point so I'd expect the team to keep it that way.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

By saying Voth may be wrong, one can logically deduce that I could be wrong as well.

it just didn't need to be said man. It would have been much easier for you to google rather than dispute with limited knowledge. I will logically deduce that you didn't do your research before disagreeing with it.

 

Even prior to your comment @Saca312 shared that it wouldn't be held against our compensatory pick. Some times we just are not correct, its life. Stand by it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...