Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DE Marcus Davenport or WR Calvin Ridley at 24


Soul Rebel

Recommended Posts

Curious to see if the Panthers are on the clock at 24 and have both Davenport and Ridley still available, who would you take?

  • Hernandez, Wynn, Alexander, Ward, James, Jackson, Guice as well as the early picks are all off the board.
  • Still available: Reid, Price, & Oliver

 

I just finished an online twitter mock and had this dilemma. I only want 3 WRs in this draft: Ridley, Moore and ESB. Ridley in R1, Moore in R2, not R1 unless everyone is off the board & ESB in R3. 

I love Davenport and think we need a DE but went with Ridley. 

My results through 3 rounds to go with no trades or player movement:

R1: Calvin Ridley WR  Alabama

R2: DeShon Elliott SAF  Texas

R3: Chad Thomas DE  Miami

R3: Austin Corbett OG/C  Nevada

 

Running backs flew off the board and all TEs were gone early R3. Fumagalli went early R4, but wasn't worth the 88th overall pick....plus I prefer Shultz or Smythe over Fumagalli. 

I'm kind of regretting not going Davenport at 24 because I could have gotten ESB with one of my R3 picks and think we'd be better set for the future. However, giving Cam arguably the best WR in this draft was too hard to pass up. Funch-Ridley-Smith-Samuel-Wright-Byrd is a pretty stacked WR unit. 

The point of this is that I'm seeing how easy it is to poke and second-guess GMs on the draft. Hindsight is easy afterwards, but when you're in the moment, you make a move with a plan, only you have such little control over the direction it goes after that selection. So here I am waiting for my 5th round pick to come up and still need a RB, TE, CB and another SAF. I really thought I could get Penny/Johnson in R3 and a TE, but it didn't happen. 

I'm happy with the haul so far for us. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Davenport.

I like Ridley, good player.  But we just signed Smith (I still think he is not The guy for #1 target)  but we need help at DE as well.

We have Hall who hasnt played a reguoar season game yet.  A aging Pep who probably has 1 year left and limited snaps, a solid Addison, and a Average Horton.

 

Davenport is a Freak.  Im not a fan of small school kids that often because generally a bigger learning curve.  But Davenport is a sponge.  Just read up on the senior bowl.  Day one he was the raw athlete and really struggled.  After that he was getting attention from coaches and soaked it up.  At weeks end and the game, he was damn near unsptoppable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/30/2018 at 9:17 PM, WOW!! said:

Neither get me a talented young safety..

I did in R2 chief. I know Reid is the guy everyone wants at 24, but DeShon Elliott is no joke and would be a nasty player in our secondary. The value didn't make Reid or even Harrison (if people like him) over guys like Ridley and Davenport. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...