Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Calvin Ridley Didn't Have A Single Catch


RumHam

Recommended Posts

LOL, we are who they thought we are. I'm hoping this isn't a trend. If both top receivers in this year's draft don't end up producing in week 1 or at least even contributing, that sounds like a waste of a pick. How does ATL not get Ridley involved? With Samuel out, even with him in, i'd still prefer Moore as the #3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Moore is Definitely going to be better

 

But I wouldnt laugh so fast about a Rookie going Catchless in his first game.

 

Moore has a very good chance he could do the same.

 

Right now he is behind

Funchess

Smith

Wright

CMC

Olsen

Ian Thomas

 

As far as targets go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Michael McLeod is a Cane apparently..
    • He's going way overboard. I mean, men talk this way all the time. Bryce seems like a fine young man. But he's been piss poor at his job. I wish that I could be piss poor at mine---wait, no I don't---and get paid millions.  The thing is, I've supported Bryce in the past, but he doesn't seem to be the type of QB that what I've heard Chris Canty refer to as a "force multiplier." He can't make good players great, he needs great players to make him good. He's not going to pull out a win when times get tough (at least he hasn't), but he becomes good when there is essentially nothing to play for. After trying to give Bryce the benefit of the doubt, and waiting for the light switch to stay on, I'm tired of waiting. I've seen what I need to see, and it ain't pretty. So excuse me for calling Bryce, "pussified" for not being more aggressive in his pursuit of down field plays. He appears to just not have it in him. I'm sorry, Bryce and all Bryce Stans. He's still got to go though.
    • Yeah me too. We should have taken him. He was a much better bet than most of what you find that far down. He might have been 5 stars coming out of high school, I don’t know. Just that he was highly thought of. His college career didn’t get off to a great start and he ended up on a bad team with bad protection. But you could watch him and see what he had. I don’t see a way he doesn’t have a long career as a #2, at worst. 
×
×
  • Create New...