Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Elliot Harrison’s power rankings after week 3


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

Don’t have a link, was a sponsored video or whatever on Facebook, but I thought it was interesting he has us at #5, tops in the NFCS.  I think technically we are last in the NFCS four way tie due to not winning a division game yet but Harrison has us at 5, saints at 6, Bucs next I forget exactly where, and Falcons at 13 I think. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds good to me. We need to improve our secondary so that inferior ATL and NO teams quit getting wins on us that they don't deserve.

"Hey Ron these teams are essentially air raid teams what should we do?" Ron, "build a glorious front 7 to shut down all running."

I do love our front 7, we just need some better help on the back end and some youth in a spot or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Turnip said:

Sounds good to me. We need to improve our secondary so that inferior ATL and NO teams quit getting wins on us that they don't deserve.

"Hey Ron these teams are essentially air raid teams what should we do?" Ron, "build a glorious front 7 to shut down all running."

I do love our front 7, we just need some better help on the back end and some youth in a spot or two.

By back end, you mean Safety, right?  Because, I think we're looking pretty damn solid at CB1 and CB2 these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Turnip said:

Sounds good to me. We need to improve our secondary so that inferior ATL and NO teams quit getting wins on us that they don't deserve.

"Hey Ron these teams are essentially air raid teams what should we do?" Ron, "build a glorious front 7 to shut down all running."

I do love our front 7, we just need some better help on the back end and some youth in a spot or two.

Atlanta torched us on the ground. Remember the snapping of the run game streak? We had a bad game that day. Hoping it was an aberration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Turnip said:

Sounds good to me. We need to improve our secondary so that inferior ATL and NO teams quit getting wins on us that they don't deserve.

"Hey Ron these teams are essentially air raid teams what should we do?" Ron, "build a glorious front 7 to shut down all running."

I do love our front 7, we just need some better help on the back end and some youth in a spot or two.

That's Ron all dam day we are close to being a top notch team a decent safety and Samuels on the field I feel would put us in the elite class. But honestly the assessment was so on point how can we argue look at the pick off CJs hands that was the fourth quarter. A lot of things went wrong over and over for us to barley loose that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nope Still missing it. Let's try this a different way... You have two quarterbacks from schools that ran the same kind of offense - maybe even two from the same school - on a given team (not necessarily the Panthers). One is designated the starter while the other is named the backup. Why?
    • yeah, pretty sure boss.....when things match and fit in the NFL.....the results then show it.  and when they don't, well, the results show that as well.  Bryce doesn't fit.   *but I get why late season and wants to argue with everyone Mr. Scot has also turned into a please don't talk to me about stats guy as well.  Given, the stats that reflect offensive productivity work against all your present arguments. 
    • Yeeeah...stats and rankings have zero to do with a discussion of scheme and skill set match. Maybe look up definitions of style vs ability and see if that helps. At this point, you've basically had three different people explain to you where you're wrong, but rather than addressing any of those statements, you're just resorting to straight deflection.  You don't get it. Either that or you're acting like you don't get it so that you can avoid the discussion because it's not going well for you. (that wouldn't surprise me either) 😄 Sme result either way, I suppose.
×
×
  • Create New...