Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baldy Breakdowns: Giants Are Running A "McAdoo 2.0 (Shula)" Offense


Saca312

Recommended Posts

A big part of the issue is a crappy offensive line that doesn't give Eli time to throw down the field. So he is left with short passes as his option which just loads the box and kills the running. When the line does hold, Eli is likely so unwilling to trust it he takes the easy checkdowns.

As for the offense, didn't Shurmur always work in a West coast offense which emphasizes short timing passes? How does that relate to the Coryell system Shula ran here for years.? Seems to me that the play call was good and the Giants had OBJ wide open. Eli was the problem at least on the first video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The quick shots are a product of the horrid oline though. It’s hard getting explosive plays when your oline is trash and you have a human statue at qb. I remember watching that game and calling blitzes on 3rd and long and it would happen every time. Can’t say enough how AWFUL their oline is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They used Mcadoo as a scapegoat for Eli’s ineptitude. They should of cut ties with Eli last year when they had the chance but that moron Gettleman thought he still had something. 

 

When the giants get a decent QB they will be a scary team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...