Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Still had no explanation on the picked up flag


KillaCamNewton

Recommended Posts

People can talk about the gift we got on 3rd and 1 on the last drive but the game should have been iced at the 2 minute mark with that illegal contact penalty. Very bizzare that there was no replay and I’m not sure how you can pick up a flag on illegal contact as it’s not like defensive holding which can be negated by the quarterback being out of the pocket or PI being negated by an uncatchable ball. If the receiver is hit after 5 yards it’s a penalty. No questions asked. For the ref to throw the flag then pick it up seemed like he didnt want to decide the game with a penalty. 

for context- the Giants had burned their timeouts and we would have had 1st and goal at the 10 with a little over 2 mins left. Would have allowed us to drain the clock to about the 35 second mark and kick a chipshot to go up 6. Giants would have gotten the ball with 30 seconds left and forced to score a TD drive with no timeouts.

Questionable to say the least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How sad is it that I had so little faith in our D that I was hoping their TD where the ref missed Jackson touching the receiver down was going to end up standing? All I was thinking was give our offense some more clock to work with to try to answer. I had zero faith in the D to hold. I was just afraid they'd give up the score with too little time remaining for us to answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

How sad is it that I had so little faith in our D that I was hoping their TD where the ref missed Jackson touching the receiver down was going to end up standing? All I was thinking was give our offense some more clock to work with to try to answer. I had zero faith in the D to hold. I was just afraid they'd give up the score with too little time remaining for us to answer.

I'm not going to lie, I said the same thing. I wanted it to stand to give us a more to score rather than whatever the Giants were going to end up giving us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

How sad is it that I had so little faith in our D that I was hoping their TD where the ref missed Jackson touching the receiver down was going to end up standing? All I was thinking was give our offense some more clock to work with to try to answer. I had zero faith in the D to hold. I was just afraid they'd give up the score with too little time remaining for us to answer.

I was thinking the same thing, really because of the D. But so Cam would have had more time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, FakePlasticTrees said:

The reason that flag was picked up was because the balll was tipped at the line of scrimmage. Once the ball is touched there is no illegal contact.

False. That only applies to pass interference. Illegal contact is called before the ball is thrown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, KillaCamNewton said:

False. That only applies to pass interference. Illegal contact is called before the ball is thrown

I think in the situation where the contact is of a player who is not the intended receiver, illegal contact can still be called. Pass interference is only called in the area the ball is thrown. However, if the ball is tipped there is no illegal contact after the tip. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...