Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scenario: Marty is on the phone with Oakland..


Ivan The Awesome

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

..he's talking to Chuckie. 

 

Who's he gonna pick for a trade. Also would it be draft pick or player for player scenario?

 

Mine would be G Conley for a first. 

LOL I wouldn’t give up a 4th for Conley who has been terrible so far, let alone a 1st, and neither would any NFL GM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

..he's talking to Chuckie. 

 

Who's he gonna pick for a trade. Also would it be draft pick or player for player scenario?

 

Mine would be G Conley for a first. 

Are you bending over before or after your offer. Sorry, but that is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

This is why I rarely come on here or post or make posts anymore. It's bad enough when the team loses, but when you're winning and in the fashion we won yesterday? EFF that. I don't need that negativity. I lurk more and more now. Shout out to those huddlers that still post tho. 

For a 1st!?!? 

Go back to lurking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why don't we just say they can shove the late round draft picks up their ass? If they want a player they will be starting at WR in Week 1, I want a MLB in return that we can start Week 1. Starter for a Starter Not Starter for a draft pick we'll be debating whether or not they should make the final 53 man roster in 2026.
    • Why?   No. This isn't a situation of a player we want to trade because we have no use for them.  He's our starting slot WR, our leader of the young WR room, Bryce's safety option the last 2 years who he has good chemistry with. If the Vikings didn't run into WR trouble, we'd never have been even considering trading him, so why in the world should we give him up for fair market value in a vacuum for Thielen and disregard what losing him off our roster will do for us this year? A 5th round pick in 2026 is a negligible draft pick, especially with this season being so make or break for Bryce and Canales.
    • The Vikings acquiring all these late round picks has me feeling like we're about to see another CMC situation play out here. Trade a player we really like for the equivalent of what we want for them on the draft pick chart, but because of a bunch of late round picks instead of the one pick value we actually want. Which will do the same thing in the end, nothing, because 6th and 7th round picks rarely work out to begin with, or we're just going to use them to move up 10 picks in the 3rd or 4th round to take another DJ Johnson
×
×
  • Create New...