Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A Helpful Poll: Fire Rivera Now, At The End Of The Season, Or Retain Him?


TylerDurden

A Helpful Poll: Fire Rivera Now, At The End Of The Season, Or Retain Him?  

197 members have voted

  1. 1. Fire Rivera Now, At The End Of The Season, Or Retain Him?

    • Now
    • At the end of the season
    • Retain him, make other changes


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Rivera has never been shy to wait on throwing his players under the bus after losses over the years. Especially recently. Why should we be concerned with hurt feelings now? Especially when it's clear the team isn't buying in anymore.

Yea the best part about being that type of person is that your day always comes. Always does for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I picked end of season but now or end of season really makes zero difference, as long as Tep is prepping to hire new GM and coach now.  Rivera has had some great moments and seasons for us so I'll give him the benefit of lasting the season. But would be happy to wake up tomorrow to see him fired as well. Either way, absolutely time to move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cracka McNasty said:

End of season.

We fire Rivera we run the risk of Norv walking too, and that's just not good news for our offense this year and moving forward. 

I'm thinking we hire an offensive coach with his own philosophy and right hand man anyways but if WR consider going defensive coach then yeah this is a good point and we should consider keeping Norv. Overall, I've been impressed with him this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...