Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Miller’s top 50 draft prospects


raleigh-panther

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I’m confused because you are both wrong. We have two picks in the top 50 and 56 isn’t one of them. We have pick 16 and 47. To be clear there are 4 7-9 teams so we move up one spot in each round. So round 2, we pick 15th not 16th.

Also, we have pick 14 (78) in round 3 and pick 13 (109) in round 4. We will also have a 3rd round comp pick for Norwell. I’d imagine that will be pick 99 or 100. Our 4th round pick will also slot down based on all the 3rd round comps.

We’ve got a real nice bunch of picks (so close to being great after the worst case scenario happened). Likely 16, 47, 78, 100 and 115.

Fixed. I fat fingered it. Thanks for the call out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think we need to aim at shoring up the OLine. Tackle, Center, then look for an edge rusher since the draft runs deep. Let Efe work with the one's. But if we can shore up that offensive line for the future, wouldn't you rather want that? However, i'm sure Hurney will aim at the best player at a position that no one is taking that way his supporters say he's great in drafts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like matt miller just fine. but his podcast is absolute trash. Listened to one episode and his co-host immediately started with the idiotic, espn, mainstream take that "Cam Newton is teh badz at throwing the football. Iz a RB. He Suckzzzz" 

This was sometime after Cam's incredible performance last year in the playoffs against NOLA. called Matt out on twitter to back up this claim in a very nice way, no response. 

Yea go fug yourself buddy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...