Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Name a 2nd round prospect you would trade two 3rds for.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure why people are always so quick to trade up.  This draft is deep in some positions of need for us, we could end up with 4 contributors in the first 3 rounds.

Also before people start naming players that are probably going at the top of the second everyone needs to realize our two thirds would get about pick 60 which is towards the bottom of the round.

One scenario I would consider moving up for is if we were to trade down in the first and use that capital to move up in the second.  For example trading back to pick 20 gets you enough capital to move pick 47 up to 33.

So instead of 16 and 47 you would have 20 and 33.  Depending on who is there at 16 I would strongly consider that.  I think there is going to be some talent at the beginning of the second.

For example if Burns if gone you could trade back and pick up someone like Tillery (who I think is undervalued by most and could fit 3-4 or 4-3 for us) and then move up and grab someone like Winovench or a safety that you might not think will last to 47.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, jumpman910 said:

The 2nd pick is what's being discussed.

Basically moving both 3rds to move up in the top of the 2nd for a player 

Hmm...both thirds and the second rounder.  That is not what the topic said man.  Those 2 dudes I target end of round 2 using the two thirds.  We keep 47.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Hmm...both thirds and the second rounder.  That is not what the topic said man.  Those 2 dudes I target end of round 2 using the two thirds.  We keep 47.

Yeah I guess you could package two thirds and get to the bottom of the second. I guess since all the names being suggested are fringe 1st rounders/early 2nd that I just assumed it was moving two 3rds with the obvious 2nd round swap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PJ's completion % was 63% when starting games in Carolina.  Which I believe is better than Bryce when starting.  And again, 4-3 as the starter here and the LONE QB Carolina has been able to actually win with in the Tepper era.  If you ask a gambling gunslinger to come into blowouts.....they are going to go down in a blaze of glory.  Which he would do.  Yeah, he isn't good.  And gunslingers are supposed to have rockier stats than checkdown QBs.   So....why does PJ Walker have a better comp % as a starter than Bryce Young.  And for every knock you want to make about PJ, you can find something or a skillset that PJ does better than Bryce.   I didn't say PJ had good field vision.  He doesn't.  Tell me about Bryce after he comes off the first read lol.  Let me repeat, PJ Walker is not a good QB.  He is NFL depth and an in house arm.  Bryce Young doesn't belong in a convo w/ Jake and Cam.  He belongs closer in a convo with the backup caliber QBs Carolina was forced into playing.  Which isn't just PJ Walker.  But Kyle Allen.  Moore.  Guys like that.   
    • Oh I see what you meant by memory. I will trust my memory, I have looked a a lot of those ball charts for Bryce and they trend a general pattern. They thing that has changed that I have noticed more recently is the reduction in the bunching of behind or at  the LOS passes over to his right.  Aside from the quantity of throws recently since the running game has become a more dominant factor. 
    • Yes but you basically said you are going from a quick skim of those charts without doing the same for Bryce and/or Andy. So you are going memory vs. snapshots. That's not going to be a very comprehensive analysis.
×
×
  • Create New...