Name a 2nd round prospect you would trade two 3rds for.

[Jeremy Igo]

And go....

[Cpt slay a ho]

Nassir Adderly

[ncfan]

Nassir Adderly, Chauncey Gardner Johnson, Chris Lindstrom

Pretty much any 1st round guy that gets pushed out of the 1st, or top 2nd

[DeAngelo Beason]

14 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

And go....

No one.  3rd and 5th for Will Grier.

[Jaxel]

Daniel Jones.

[DeSim]

Hakeem Butler

[Shocker]

Savage or Thompson...assuming first two picks are OL, DL

[countryboi]

We have so many needs, I would rather trade back for extra picks than trade up for one guy. 

[AU-panther]

I'm not sure why people are always so quick to trade up.  This draft is deep in some positions of need for us, we could end up with 4 contributors in the first 3 rounds.

Also before people start naming players that are probably going at the top of the second everyone needs to realize our two thirds would get about pick 60 which is towards the bottom of the round.

One scenario I would consider moving up for is if we were to trade down in the first and use that capital to move up in the second.  For example trading back to pick 20 gets you enough capital to move pick 47 up to 33.

So instead of 16 and 47 you would have 20 and 33.  Depending on who is there at 16 I would strongly consider that.  I think there is going to be some talent at the beginning of the second.

For example if Burns if gone you could trade back and pick up someone like Tillery (who I think is undervalued by most and could fit 3-4 or 4-3 for us) and then move up and grab someone like Winovench or a safety that you might not think will last to 47.

[LinvilleGorge]

No clue. Have to see who is actually available in the 2nd. Based on his history though, any call Hurney makes they'll want next year's 1st.

[mc52beast]

Could be a scenario where Steelers want a LB still available at 16 and would trade with us.

[jumpman910]

42 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Savage or Thompson...assuming first two picks are OL, DL

The 2nd pick is what's being discussed.

Basically moving both 3rds to move up in the top of the 2nd for a player 

[Shocker]

10 minutes ago, jumpman910 said:

The 2nd pick is what's being discussed.

Basically moving both 3rds to move up in the top of the 2nd for a player 

Hmm...both thirds and the second rounder.  That is not what the topic said man.  Those 2 dudes I target end of round 2 using the two thirds.  We keep 47.

[jumpman910]

12 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Hmm...both thirds and the second rounder.  That is not what the topic said man.  Those 2 dudes I target end of round 2 using the two thirds.  We keep 47.

Yeah I guess you could package two thirds and get to the bottom of the second. I guess since all the names being suggested are fringe 1st rounders/early 2nd that I just assumed it was moving two 3rds with the obvious 2nd round swap.