Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So the question now is..


The Question

Recommended Posts

Will you be confident in our coverage IF we can sign Berry as a stop gap and depend on Bradbury and Jackson to make another step forward and become an elite duo? I personally would be fine with this and think we can be top tier IF we make that signing. Do you consider this draft a flop because of the lack of a safety pick? Me thinks people are over reacting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Little Goody Two Shoes said:

And all stay healthy.

Of course this is always a factor but it’s nothing Colin Jones isn’t used to. I know he sucks but he has starts. Maybe they see something in Gaulden that we don’t as hard as that is to even say after watching him last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People need to realize the secondary also suffered do to a consistent lack of pressure, could we use a talent upgrade on the back end sure, but at the same time if we consistently apply pressure up front and don't allow time for the chunk plays that killed the absence of a new safety is minimized. 

We did invest a 3rd (Gaulden) last season and while he may get looks inside, he's sure to receive opportunities at safety. I wouldn't have drafted a safety over Little in the 2nd, and at 100 which is basically a 4th were we really expecting to get a starter or just a forum favorite at that point. 

There are still FA's available in FA and after cuts, the picks we made were much more important if I'm not being selfish and wanted the safety for the sake of it. I do think we'd have missed out on Little at 47, and I do think if we'd kept our pick we would have probably added a safety with the high 3rd. 

However the OL, and pass rush trump safety so I can accept that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're able to get constant pressure it'll help make our safeties and DBs in general look better than they are. If the QB never has a clean pocket to throw, his passes will be rushed and not entirely accurate, thus a bad secondary can end up looking decent or actually good. It's how Mike Mitchell thrived for us that one year.  This draft helped definitely we ended up getting two guys who can get to the QB. Burns was one of the top guys at pressures and Miller is another guy who can wreak havok. Best case scenario we sign another veteran capable guy, but if we can get to the QB I think the safety position might surprisingly look ok this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moo Daeng said:

Berry has played 3 games the previous 2 years. Just no. 

This. I love Berry because he’s been a great player with a great story and a great leader/person, but if he can’t stay on the field then none of that really matters. He’d make very little sense to sign at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good grief, on not drafting a fkn safety.

Reid is the best safety we have had since Minter. And we have had good/great defenses in previous years with JAGs back there. 1st priority was to fix what changed over those last defenses; stock up on guys that get to the QB. Last year not only could we not get home vs the QB, he had time to read D and go thru progressions. Take away his time and his space and the secondary will look better.

 

Boston, Mitchell, Addae, Berry all still unsigned.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really dont want to put my hopes in an injured vet to save the day.  We cant have Pro Bowlers at every position and we obviously dont value the FS position in our D.

just find a competent FS that isn't Colin Jones, and that should be sufficient.  A JAG.  somebody whose name you rarely hear unless its to make a solid play.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...