Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam doesn’t have any weapons so Panthers won’t win division


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

Just watched a video on NFL.com , some freaking idiot said with a straight face that Cam doesn’t have any weapons and the offense will struggle. Mentioned DJ Moore like he was a nobody, didn’t even talk about Samuel or CMC. 

This team has the most weapons it’s ever had yet people act like we’re signing guys off the couch... 

I hope we f’ing dominate teams this year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some cam fanboy / auburn fans will never be happy. NFL isn’t college. Cam doesn’t have weapons, coaches, oline, etc. Excuses after excuses. With all that any wb can be good. Looking at Russell Wilson and Andrew luck who have both had worse olines but better success...a great qb elevates those around them, not the other way around. Good example is 2015 Cam. We need him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Lumps said:

Some cam fanboy / auburn fans will never be happy. NFL isn’t college. Cam doesn’t have weapons, coaches, oline, etc. Excuses after excuses. With all that any wb can be good. Looking at Russell Wilson and Andrew luck who have both had worse olines but better success...a great qb elevates those around them, not the other way around. Good example is 2015 Cam. We need him back.

go on popcorn GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of McCaffrey we don't have any household names on offense. We had Olsen in the past but injuries and age have limited him the past couple of years. We know we have 2 young guys who have potential to be very good in Moore and Samuel. But looking at it as a fan in general other teams don't know much about Moore and Samuel so they don't respect them yet as major weapons.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love it. The years when we're being completely overlooked are usually the years when we perform our best. I get it. Moore had a decent rookie year, but didn't come on until late. Samuel shows a lot of potential, but has struggled staying on the field. Olsen is an aging vet coming off of two injury prone seasons. 

We don't have a lot of provide NFL production at the receiver positions, but we have a lot of young talent with potential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samuel has yet to play a full season and DJ was a rookie with limited playing time last year. We don't have any WRs that have proved themselves to be superstars yet, so its only natural most fans and talking heads that haven't watched every detail of our games would think we don't have much outside of CMC who had a decent rookie year and a good 2nd year. 

Once Samuel or Moore gets a 1000 + or 10TD + season then people will stop saying that stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Rubi said:

A developing Ian Thomas is gonna be nice for the offense. He’s a physical specimen 

Rivera is gonna keep him on the bench as long as Olsen is healthy cause apparently Manhertz is one of the best TEs in NFL history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they genuinely paid attention, the only thing they could question are rb2 and maybe Moores ball security. We’ve got more wr potential than most teams and I don’t think most of these talking heads appreciate what guys like Wright or Hogan do(unless he was accompanied by Tom Brady.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Rivera is gonna keep him on the bench as long as Olsen is healthy cause apparently Manhertz is one of the best TEs in NFL history.

Rivera doesn't have any say on the offense anymore.. So try not to trip over this narrative...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Rivera is gonna keep him on the bench as long as Olsen is healthy cause apparently Manhertz is one of the best TEs in NFL history.

Except Norv will be running the offense and making personnel calls. Rivera is doing the defense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would be happy with Lomu or Iheanachor at 19. Fano is intriguing but I don't think he makes it.
    • II see it this way: We have to look at long-term needs and current depth.  We have filled some key spots with players on one-year contracts.  I firmly believe that they intend to pay Bryce some big bucks next year.  That means you cannot hope that your rookies in 2027 can fill the spots vacated by the veterans you could not afford to re-sign.   We need to consider the cap and the fact that the need to start a rookie is not viewed as a positive by coaches and general managers, but they value first contracts--so it is a delicate balance. I think they have to look at the cap by position--"Can we afford a $50m QB and a $100m OL?  That is half the cap, before you pay your WRs and RBs and TEs.  They need to start getting younger on the OL as well.   I am not suggesting that we draft OT in round 1, but we could and I would get it.  RT on a 1-year deal, they may have intel about Ickey (who was not the best LT, to be honest) and 32-year old Moton is on a bad wheel.   Now if you go by Morgan's history, you can almost tell what position we are going to address with the first pick by noting the positions he has not focused on in free agency.  DT, considering the lack of performance by those not named Derrick Brown and the loss of Robinson, is screaming to be addressed with a top player.  Wharton is not an early down DT (DE if you want to get technical) and our LBs need to be clean--they were not in 2025.  Look for a DT early. I also think we will address ILB (pass covering Will) on day 2.  The other day 2 pick will be an OT, in my view. Do not rule out CB.  We are thin there too, and Jackson is in his final year.  I am not sure that we love Smith-Wade.  Some crackhead on here talked about moving him to S----stay tuned.   Hopefully, a team wanting Ty Simpson will move up and offer us a pick or two to move back. DT WILB OT OC QB  (you heard it here 337th--but this pick could come sooner than you think.      
    • Bryce had some bad games, but he had some good ones as well (and this is coming from a Bryce skeptic). I think it's a little simplistic to put all the offensive woes on Bryce, you also should be looking at O-line play, receiver play, RB and TE play, and also coaching. There's no way when I look at the offense in it's totality am I ready to say that a so-so to bad offense was all on Bryce, and, I also can't say that we don't need to upgrade any position on offense, save Tetairoa McMillan (who also wasn't perfect) and maybe the starting guards and T-mo.
×
×
  • Create New...