Panthers deepest and least deep positions.

[Jeremy Igo]

So what now are the Panthers two deepest and two least deep positions?

For me: 

 

Deepest -

WR (wtf?)

DT

 

Least deep -

FS

LT

[Ivan The Awesome]

It's crazy how they are indeed deep at wr yet the national media says they don't have a receiving Corp. 

[Joe the Show]

Long snapper is pretty thin.  I'd like to see some competition added.

[KendrickPanther]

I think the Panthers will have a hard time keeping all the edge rushers. There are at least 4 guys with 2 years or less that show promise.

DT and WR are obviously deep but I would say TE looks good this year.

 

QB and FS are least deepest.

[electro's horse]

probably the best WR group since 2003.

[KendrickPanther]

I think everyone feels really good about RB, if we lost CMC to injury though.... It could completely change how our offense is run. 

[BrianS]

Deep:  WR, DL

Thin:  S, ILB

[kungfoodude]

1 hour ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

It's crazy how they are indeed deep at wr yet the national media says they don't have a receiving Corp. 

We are deep but very thin on "proven" WR's. That is why the national media consistently overlooks them. If Samuel makes it through a season healthy, he will get some respect. If DJ Moore is able to avoid the sophomore slump, he will also get some national attention. But, that also hasn't happened yet. 

Quote

LT is deep. It may not be our best starting spot but we’ve got Daryl, Little and Moton with Daley as well. We need one of the first two to step up and seize the spot but saying it isn’t deep is a mistake. I’d say it’s deeper than last year (Moton was backup for both spots) or back in 2015 where we had 1 LT and 2 RTs. You were the one asserting that Williams had been successful at LT before so having 3 guys who can play LT and 3 guys who can play RT is much better off than last year or 2015. 

I think you are listing a lot of guys that are probably much more RT's than they are quality LT's, so I cannot disagree with Jeremy on his assertion that we are thin at LT. 

[Squirrel]

Bunch of munchkins at WR.  

[CBDellinger]

we are deep at WR and the best receiver on the team might just play RB.  thats some wild stuff.

[Raleigh PF]

ILB. I'm also not sold on Shaq. He really seems to be a "system" guy, not an all around great player. If Kuechly goes, there's nothing but unprovens behind him.

PR/KR - there's no don't have a slam dunk here. Whoever loses rock, paper, scissors, I guess. 

[Shocker]

Deep at QB and RB and TE and WR

Thin at safety

[trueblade]

2 hours ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

It's crazy how they are indeed deep at wr yet the national media says they don't have a receiving Corp. 

Its about name recognition. We know DJ, and Curtis, most people don't. Hogan and Torrey probably have more name recognition outside the Panther's fan base. If things go well for the Panthers, that will change.

[Black&BlueBubba]

I would say WR, De/OLB, and DL are deep.

Thin?  Both safety spots.  Who is behind Reid?  And behind Boston is Cockrell. But if he is needed at nickel or another spot it is pretty bare.