Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Olsen tries to calm down the chicken littles


panthers55

Recommended Posts

After last season's collapse, you would think that it's understandable that fans had reason to question things like our Oline or effort. Just win and a lot of that goes away or becomes a more civil discussion.

Example, we signed a center who is getting tossed around. That is a concern that isn't wholly subdued by the relaxation our line has a lot of gelling left to do.

Love Olsen but winning games is what is going to convince me they are fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jackofalltrades said:

My concern isn’t based on playbook utilization, but on fundamental football. It’s nearly the regular season and keeping our QB’s protected is still a concern. The effort level over the last two games has been concerning as well, that doesn’t have anything to do with scheme. 

I'm concerned with the OL as well but having said this, the Pats blitzed a lot against the Panthers and in a real world situation, Cam would have called an audible and likely checked down to CMC.  CMC will slow a pass rush down in a hurry.

I had TV issues and had to watch the game on a Pats feed and the announcers were commenting that Brady was targeting new receivers and working on certain throws (as he usually does) rather than trying to hit the open receiver.  Perhaps Cam and the Panthers were doing the same thing and most teams are treating preseason like a practice now so us fans need to relax a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, countryboi said:

man the trenches are one of the few things that translate from the preseason to the regular season. if you are having protection issues and problems getting to the QB in the preseason they aint going no where when the season starts. 

This is true but it’s also a unit that takes some time to gel if there are new players, which there are two. Especially center where most of the call outs for the line come from. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...