Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bruce Irvin return what that it means for burns...


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Well, Ian Thomas hasn't seen the field yet in 2019. Wouldn't be surprised Rivera if not against the Texans, then the next game to bring Irvin into the starting role.

I love the idea of a healthy rotation but with the way we are using Greg, again, I'm not going to put a lot of hope into that basket. It's not how we roll. Manhertz, Williams...will Irvin be next in the 2019 personel mismanagement? At best he balls out and at least one younger guy doesn't get the reps he should because reasons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, micnificent28 said:

I could only see Millers reps increase.. he was a stud last week with what 2 sacks? That's the kind of production you want to see out of the rook.. shows the light could be coming on. He was a 5 star prospect coming into Alabama.. he finally be  blossoming all that unrefined talent.

Exactly.  People keep saying that next year we draft another stud to put on the other side of Burns and I say we already have him.  I think that the mental aspect was already there and the physical had to catch up because of injury.  The kid basically ripped his hammy to shreds.  He was real unblockable before that happened and he is the son of another NFLer.  He will definitely be better than just another JAG.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the idea from the beginning was to give Burns all the reps he could handle in the rotation. They were never going to limit him. Why limit your 1st round pick who is excelling in his play? (And do not give me that fu6king, you know Ron or it's River so who knows bs.) Irvin is part of the rotation and that's a good thing. Gives our guys a couple more puffs of oxygen on the sideline. He's also teaching the entire game with his play and sideline chatter. I heard he's a talker. We're better off with him playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...