Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who Charted?


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

WHO CHARTED?

A weekly look at the Next Gen Stats charts of the key players in the Carolina Panthers games.

This week, the charts of the Carolina Panthers victory of the Houston Texans.

Kyle Allen

pass-chart_ALL543234_2019-reg-4_1569791199159.jpeg

Unfortunately, this does not convey Allen's fumbles, as those obviously play a significant role in his performance. Allen looks like he distributed the ball really evenly across the field this game. Also, one of those white dots at +40 would have been green if not for an uncalled pass interference on Curtis Samuel.

 

Jarius Wright

route-chart_WRI391959_2019-reg-4_1569791238866.jpeg

This chart conveys exactly what Wright is all about. Get open and catch the damn ball. 6 targets, 5 receptions. This guy is going to be a huge part of the puzzle this year as teams start to gameplan for Moore and Samuel.

And Finally, CMC

carry-chart_MCC035988_2019-reg-4_1569791214273.jpeg

27 carries is a lot for any running back in the NFL. For CMC who is also so heavily involved with the passing game, it is even more of a workload. Why the hell did we keep all those running backs on the roster if we don't plan on using any of them? The CMC stats are great and all, but all NFL running backs have an expiration date. Using CMC this much now is only shortening the length of his career. They must find a way to balance his performance with the backup runners.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thing Kyle doesn't really get credit for is the passes that were very much on target, well timed, and the DB just made an excellent play on. This happened at least four times from what I saw, most notably when our gameplan was to attack Jonathan Joseph deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Way too many lines coming from CMC. Same ol' same ol' from Rivera. Run your stud into the ground.

The rest of it looks great, but that CMC chart is very troubling.

Why does everyone keep saying it's Rivera's fault. Throughout Rivera's tenure we have always used 2 running backs. William's and Stewart, then Stewart and Tolbert. It wasn't until Norv took over and couldn't figure out how to use both CMC and CJ Anderson that we started over using our main rusher. Norv is old school and not at all with the times unfortunately for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Why does everyone keep saying it's Rivera's fault. Throughout Rivera's tenure we have always used 2 running backs. William's and Stewart, then Stewart and Tolbert. It wasn't until Norv took over and couldn't figure out how to use both CMC and CJ Anderson that we started over using our main rusher. Norv is old school and not at all with the times unfortunately for us. 

This is where you're wrong.  What you're seeing here is an unspoken truth.  The staff (aka Norv) doesn't really trust any of the other backs on the roster.  If you look back over Norv's career, you'll find that when he has only one back that he really trusts, he feeds that guy.  Emmitt Smith and his first couple seasons with LT you find this pattern.

Later, when Norv finds Sproles, you see quite a few touches coming of LT's plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

Why does everyone keep saying it's Rivera's fault. Throughout Rivera's tenure we have always used 2 running backs. William's and Stewart, then Stewart and Tolbert. It wasn't until Norv took over and couldn't figure out how to use both CMC and CJ Anderson that we started over using our main rusher. Norv is old school and not at all with the times unfortunately for us. 

People just repeating mantras without thinking. This is one of the defining aspects of a Turner offense we should be well aware of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Mays has a market, which it seems he will, he's gone.  I think we bring back Nijman for too much money to be cautious at LT, Corbett comes back cheap since he's already said he wants to live in CLT, and Christensen eventually gets re-signed with the hopes he can be depth at some point.  Draft an OT, draft a C. The OL might be rough for stretches next year, but time to get some youth there to prepare for Bryce in 2027 or the next QB. I still think we compete for the division in 2026 and can go back to the playoffs unlike the oddsmakers in Vegas, but the *real* year is 2027 IMO. Either Bryce has proven it and he's the QB looking at his 2nd contract, or we have the ready-made team for the next rookie QB or Vet we trade for. 
    • The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
×
×
  • Create New...