Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SI Layoffs


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Being reported that Sports Illustrated is laying off about 40% of their staff.

Andy Benoit, a guy I know some folks here liked, is one of the victims. Near as I can tell, Jonathan Jones is not.

Haven't seen any other names I recognized just yet. Will be interested to see if the writers who broke the Jerry Richardson and Antonio Brown stories survive the purge (I would guess they will).

Multiple online sites are reporting the story. Voth cited this one from The Ringer. It sounds like an unholy mess.

Crueler and Dumber by the Day: On ‘Sports Illustrated’ and a Dark Media Landscape

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't imagine sport's journalism is a particularly lucrative business model in 2019.  We have access to everything we want from the teams we follow via social media, statistic sites like PFF and team sites. It seems like the writing has been on the wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want fake news, this is how we get fake news. It's sad to see it, but in a world of junk reading material no one puts any value on real journalism. Lead pipes made the Romans dumber and dumber until they lost their empire. Arsenic in wall paper made the British dumber and dumber until their wealthy became twits and lost their empire. An overabundance of bad information and click bait is doing the same to us.

Hope those folks all find work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

If you want fake news, this is how we get fake news. It's sad to see it, but in a world of junk reading material no one puts any value on real journalism. Lead pipes made the Romans dumber and dumber until they lost their empire. Arsenic in wall paper made the British dumber and dumber until their wealthy became twits and lost their empire. An overabundance of bad information and click bait is doing the same to us.

Hope those folks all find work.

TLDR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

If you want fake news, this is how we get fake news. It's sad to see it, but in a world of junk reading material no one puts any value on real journalism. Lead pipes made the Romans dumber and dumber until they lost their empire. Arsenic in wall paper made the British dumber and dumber until their wealthy became twits and lost their empire. An overabundance of bad information and click bait is doing the same to us.

Hope those folks all find work.

you may be surprised how many cities in the US have lead in the water.   it certainly explains a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

If you want fake news, this is how we get fake news. It's sad to see it, but in a world of junk reading material no one puts any value on real journalism. Lead pipes made the Romans dumber and dumber until they lost their empire. Arsenic in wall paper made the British dumber and dumber until their wealthy became twits and lost their empire. An overabundance of bad information and click bait is doing the same to us.

Hope those folks all find work.

Yep.  The new SI “model” is already out. 

Fire real journalist.  Then barely pay a bunch of nobody contractors for cheap that will just post a bunch of crap online for people to digest. 

Same folks attempted this literal move with the LA Times before a harassment issue forced them to abandon them.  Now they end up at SI

https://www.google.com/amp/s/deadspin.com/inside-themavens-plan-to-turn-sports-illustrated-into-a-1838756286/amp

seeing the same tactics across the board in all walks.   We literally have internet trolls all over the landscape right now.  I mean we even have internet personalities the US government is treating as experts in a particular field “informing” the public. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...