Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An eye for an eye...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

...and a groin for a groin? :thinking:

It seems the Packers might possibly also be down a starting corner tomorrow thanks to, coincidentally enough, a groin injury

The Packers made a late addition to their injury report on Friday and it adds to the uncertainty about who they’ll have in the secondary against the Panthers.

Cornerback Jaire Alexander was added to the report as a limited participant in practice because of a groin injury. He has been listed as questionable to play against Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moo Daeng said:

Lol

Turner makes the gameplan for the offense.

Lol

Have you noticed Turner tayloring his gameplan to the opponent? Not saying he isn't, just saying I haven't noticed us doing this, and it's long been one of the things that bugs me about Ron's teams. I've liked Turner as OC better than what we had in the past, but I can't think of any specific examples of him game planning for a weakness like injuries to starters off the top of my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Probably the team with Aaron Rodgers at QB. 

Lmfaoooo 

36 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Have you noticed Turner tayloring his gameplan to the opponent? Not saying he isn't, just saying I haven't noticed us doing this, and it's long been one of the things that bugs me about Ron's teams. I've liked Turner as OC better than what we had in the past, but I can't think of any specific examples of him game planning for a weakness like injuries to starters off the top of my head.

That’s what I’m saying not criticizing but wondering do we attack a team as much as we think we should. I’m starting to think maybe it’s because we’re limited with Kyles shaky deep ball so we’re somewhat limited. This week is no different if we’re in any type of snow Ron may scrap any normal passing plays past ten yards and go full conservative all game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's definitely a bigger loss for the Panthers if Bradberry doesn't play. I don't see Kyle Allen and our receiving corps really exploiting a weakness at corner and you sure as hell can believe Rodgers will try to take advantage of Bradberry being out. I think we can weather Bradberry being out if that's ultimately the case cause Cockrell has proven he can step up and be a serviceable starting corner if necessary. But it sure doesn't make things any easier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

It's definitely a bigger loss for the Panthers if Bradberry doesn't play. I don't see Kyle Allen and our receiving corps really exploiting a weakness at corner and you sure as hell can believe Rodgers will try to take advantage of Bradberry being out. I think we can weather Bradberry being out if that's ultimately the case cause Cockrell has proven he can step up and be a serviceable starting corner if necessary. But it sure doesn't make things any easier. 

What worries me isn’t Cockrell, cause I agree he’s played well. What worries me is Rogers targeting the guy who now has to come off the bench and take Cockrell’s spot, which is Elliot. Much and more might depend on how he can hold up in coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a good story--I LOVED his dad as a person and player--I talked to him at an OTA (he was back for his second stint) and he was talking about Moore (the WR from Wake Forest) being so young.  I was with my teenage son and told him, "This is Taylor.  He and I attended the OTAs when you were in Rock Hill as a rookie."  He jokes, "Was he in diapers then?" and laughed.  I imagine Moose III was in diapers when we chatted that day.  So I really would love for this to work out.  However, his stats do not suggest he was anything special in college.
    • I guess there are signs. The combination of the turf toe, hamstring, and knee issues led to questions about his long-term health and affected his draft stock, causing him to fall to the second round.  Here is what I know about a knee injury.  It changes nearly every aspect of your lower body movement.  So the turf toe and hamstring could be related.  It makes him seem injury prone.  I guess the knee was not the most recent injury, so the others could have been a result of favoring the knee. Johnson did not run the 40 at the combine or pro day.  That suggests there is something he feels might drop his value.  So if you downplay the severity of the injury, have a history of possibly related injuries, and refuse to demonstrate (when given multiple opportunities) that you are fully recovered, don't get mad when your stock drops. 
    • I saw numerous reports leading up to the draft that he'd been injury red flagged by numerous teams due to cartilage damage and wear issues that they think could shorten his career.
×
×
  • Create New...