Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An eye for an eye...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

...and a groin for a groin? :thinking:

It seems the Packers might possibly also be down a starting corner tomorrow thanks to, coincidentally enough, a groin injury

The Packers made a late addition to their injury report on Friday and it adds to the uncertainty about who they’ll have in the secondary against the Panthers.

Cornerback Jaire Alexander was added to the report as a limited participant in practice because of a groin injury. He has been listed as questionable to play against Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moo Daeng said:

Lol

Turner makes the gameplan for the offense.

Lol

Have you noticed Turner tayloring his gameplan to the opponent? Not saying he isn't, just saying I haven't noticed us doing this, and it's long been one of the things that bugs me about Ron's teams. I've liked Turner as OC better than what we had in the past, but I can't think of any specific examples of him game planning for a weakness like injuries to starters off the top of my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Probably the team with Aaron Rodgers at QB. 

Lmfaoooo 

36 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Have you noticed Turner tayloring his gameplan to the opponent? Not saying he isn't, just saying I haven't noticed us doing this, and it's long been one of the things that bugs me about Ron's teams. I've liked Turner as OC better than what we had in the past, but I can't think of any specific examples of him game planning for a weakness like injuries to starters off the top of my head.

That’s what I’m saying not criticizing but wondering do we attack a team as much as we think we should. I’m starting to think maybe it’s because we’re limited with Kyles shaky deep ball so we’re somewhat limited. This week is no different if we’re in any type of snow Ron may scrap any normal passing plays past ten yards and go full conservative all game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's definitely a bigger loss for the Panthers if Bradberry doesn't play. I don't see Kyle Allen and our receiving corps really exploiting a weakness at corner and you sure as hell can believe Rodgers will try to take advantage of Bradberry being out. I think we can weather Bradberry being out if that's ultimately the case cause Cockrell has proven he can step up and be a serviceable starting corner if necessary. But it sure doesn't make things any easier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

It's definitely a bigger loss for the Panthers if Bradberry doesn't play. I don't see Kyle Allen and our receiving corps really exploiting a weakness at corner and you sure as hell can believe Rodgers will try to take advantage of Bradberry being out. I think we can weather Bradberry being out if that's ultimately the case cause Cockrell has proven he can step up and be a serviceable starting corner if necessary. But it sure doesn't make things any easier. 

What worries me isn’t Cockrell, cause I agree he’s played well. What worries me is Rogers targeting the guy who now has to come off the bench and take Cockrell’s spot, which is Elliot. Much and more might depend on how he can hold up in coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, no I’m not going to panic when he got 2 Qs and looked great in 1 and looked not great in another (let’s not mention the drop).    Yeah we finally have a team that would be considered average offensively around him. Let’s roll this season. 
    • The woe is me everything but Bryce sucks mantra is stale af my friend. Look nobody here is going to argue with the fact Frank Reich was not a good head coach. At the same time. Bryce Young is now in his second season with his second coaching staff and a handpicked young offensive head coach who has been known for working with QB's such as Baker and Geno. As far as the offensive pieces around Bryce we have the 4th highest salary cap allocation (that might be even higher now after the new Moton deal) dedicated to the OL in the entire league. We have 2 first round WR's one of them 8th overall the first time we've ever selected a WR that high in franchise history. And the fact of the matter is Bryce Young did not have a good preseason. It's not the first time it's happened either. We all hope to see he and the rest of the team flip a switch in week 1. But we should all be able to agree that the offensive performances we've seen from the entire QB room (Bryce included) in preseason was simply unacceptable.
    • We have seen Bryce play… what… 9 games with AT BEST what one would consider NFL average WRs? You just can’t see the forest for the trees and keep going back to your lazy take of revisionist history.    he looked AWFUL Y1 with the worst coaching I’ve ever seen in the NFL and one of the weakest WR rooms I can recall. He looked awful first half of y2 and great second half of y2 with average coaching and average skill position. I don’t know where this elite talent argument even comes from. 
×
×
  • Create New...