Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

An eye for an eye...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

...and a groin for a groin? :thinking:

It seems the Packers might possibly also be down a starting corner tomorrow thanks to, coincidentally enough, a groin injury

The Packers made a late addition to their injury report on Friday and it adds to the uncertainty about who they’ll have in the secondary against the Panthers.

Cornerback Jaire Alexander was added to the report as a limited participant in practice because of a groin injury. He has been listed as questionable to play against Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moo Daeng said:

Lol

Turner makes the gameplan for the offense.

Lol

Have you noticed Turner tayloring his gameplan to the opponent? Not saying he isn't, just saying I haven't noticed us doing this, and it's long been one of the things that bugs me about Ron's teams. I've liked Turner as OC better than what we had in the past, but I can't think of any specific examples of him game planning for a weakness like injuries to starters off the top of my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Probably the team with Aaron Rodgers at QB. 

Lmfaoooo 

36 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

Have you noticed Turner tayloring his gameplan to the opponent? Not saying he isn't, just saying I haven't noticed us doing this, and it's long been one of the things that bugs me about Ron's teams. I've liked Turner as OC better than what we had in the past, but I can't think of any specific examples of him game planning for a weakness like injuries to starters off the top of my head.

That’s what I’m saying not criticizing but wondering do we attack a team as much as we think we should. I’m starting to think maybe it’s because we’re limited with Kyles shaky deep ball so we’re somewhat limited. This week is no different if we’re in any type of snow Ron may scrap any normal passing plays past ten yards and go full conservative all game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's definitely a bigger loss for the Panthers if Bradberry doesn't play. I don't see Kyle Allen and our receiving corps really exploiting a weakness at corner and you sure as hell can believe Rodgers will try to take advantage of Bradberry being out. I think we can weather Bradberry being out if that's ultimately the case cause Cockrell has proven he can step up and be a serviceable starting corner if necessary. But it sure doesn't make things any easier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Peon Awesome said:

It's definitely a bigger loss for the Panthers if Bradberry doesn't play. I don't see Kyle Allen and our receiving corps really exploiting a weakness at corner and you sure as hell can believe Rodgers will try to take advantage of Bradberry being out. I think we can weather Bradberry being out if that's ultimately the case cause Cockrell has proven he can step up and be a serviceable starting corner if necessary. But it sure doesn't make things any easier. 

What worries me isn’t Cockrell, cause I agree he’s played well. What worries me is Rogers targeting the guy who now has to come off the bench and take Cockrell’s spot, which is Elliot. Much and more might depend on how he can hold up in coverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Its completely and utterly bootlicking at this point.  If you cannot acknowledge that using 3 picks on a rb with a torn acl in the 2nd round isnt a bad pick then you simply havent a clue about football.  Sorry man it is what it is.  And its insanely laughable you are trying to strawman this argument using other players.  And what fuging facts are you bringing that is justifing morgan using 3 goddamn picks on him?  I cannot wait to hear that.
    • Scourton's interviews are telling to me that it's only a matter of time before he could really put it together.  His limitation tool-wise that I see is in his bend, but at the leaner size, it looks like it wasn't a problem at Purdue.   He has a good moveset and reads leverages very well (vet level well).  Plays both the speed/quickness (great change of direction) and has a power game with good hand usage.  Moves from what I've seen in my digs: I'm seeing cross-chop, fake crossers into bull, bull rush, spin (his preferred move of choice), hand shuck.  He's not unrefined by any means.   If he can do 2 things---I'm feeling confident from seeing his interviews that we have a real dude on our hands: 1) Diversifying his moveset/how it's deployed - Over-reliant on some, but again, he has a growing palette.  And is already great with his hands so things are in-place to coach up. 2) Developing a counter moveset and starting to play the chess game with an OT - He's very good at reading leverage, knowing when to change things up during a play.  But NFL coaching should start to teach him how to really create a plan based on an opponent.  What to throw at a guy first, how to confuse with fakes/counters, etc.  How to play against these tackles as a game progresses.   Overall, he has some things that give me serious optimism: Run Defense, speed moves, power moves, he's super young and has the size/length.  When you really spell it all out, I think we should get excited.  Temper expectations from a stat sheet standpoint, but he should be able to go in and make an impact.    
×
×
  • Create New...